Place attachment provides insight on why and to what extent individuals value a particular setting. Most investigations involving place attachment and environmental attitudes have been conducted in terrestrial settings; little work has addressed proenvironmental behavior in marine settings. The purpose of the current investigation was to extend Stern et al.’s work, which indicates that individuals’ environmental worldviews (EWVs) influence their attitudes toward anthropogenic impacts on the environment. We hypothesized a model wherein place attachment partially mediates the relationship between recreational visitors’ EWV and their awareness of consequences of negative impacts on Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. We then compared this model with competing models. Our results suggest that place attachment is a useful addition to studies that use Stern et al.’s value-belief-norm model.
AbsherJ. D.VaskeJ. J.BrightA. D. (2008). Basic beliefs, attitudes, and social norms regarding wildland fire management in Southern California. In ChavezD. J.AbsherJ. D.WinterP. L. (Eds.), Fire social science research from the pacific southwest research station: Studies supported by national fire plan funds (pp. 45-56). Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, PSW-GTR-209.
2.
AjzenI. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In KuhlJ.BeckmanJ. (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
3.
AkaikeH. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
4.
AltmanI.LowS. (1992). Place attachment, human behavior, and environment: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 12). New York, NY: Plenum.
5.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
6.
BonaiutoM.CarrusG.MartorellaH.BonnesM. (2002). Local identity processes and environmental attitudes in land use changes: The case of natural protected areas. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 631-653.
7.
BrickerK. S.KerstetterD. L. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences, 22, 233-257.
8.
ByrneB. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J.MuthenB. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
Devine-WrightP. (2011). Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy: A tidal energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 336-343.
12.
DillmanD. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
13.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
14.
EckersleyR. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach (SUNY series in environmental public policy). Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
FloydM. F.JangH. C.NoeF. P. (1997). The relationship between environmental concern and acceptability of environmental impacts among visitors to US national park settings. Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 391-412.
HairJ.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
HinrichsenD. (1997). Coral reefs in crisis: An overview of these vanishing ecosystems, the problems that plague them, and the means for saving them. BioScience, 47, 554-558.
JorgensenB. S.StedmanR. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners’ attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 233-248.
22.
KaltenbornB. P. (1997). Recreation homes in natural settings: Factors affecting place attachment. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift [Norwegian Journal of Geography], 51, 187-198.
23.
KyleG. T.GraefeA.ManningR. (2005). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment & Behavior, 37, 153-177.
24.
KyleG. T.GraefeA.ManningR.BaconJ. (2004). Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 213-225.
25.
KyleG. T.MowenA. J.TarrantM. (2004). Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 439-454.
26.
LowS. M.AltmanI. (1992). Place attachment: a conceptual inquiry. In AltmanI.LowS. M. (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Plenum.
27.
MatsunagaM. (2008). Item parceling in structural equation modeling: A primer. Communication Methods and Measures, 2, 260-293.
28.
MeschG. S.ManorG. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment & Behavior, 30, 504-519.
29.
MilliganM. J. (1998). Interactional past and potential: The social construction of place attachment. Symbolic Interaction, 21, 1-33.
30.
MonroeM. C. (2003). Two avenues for encouraging conservation behaviors. Research in Human Ecology, 10, 113-125.
31.
NilssonA.von BorgstedeC.BielA. (2004). Willingness to accept climate change strategies: The effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 267-277.
32.
PerezM. (1996). A strategy for the assessment of overall model fit in structural equation modeling for business economics. Estudios De Economía Aplicada, 6, 183-210.
33.
PreacherK. J.CoffmanD. L. (2006). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org/
34.
ProshanskyH. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment & Behavior, 10, 147-169.
35.
RaymondC. M.BrownG.RobinsonG. M. (2011). The influence of place attachment, and moral and normative concerns on the conservation of native vegetation: A test of two behavioural models. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 323-335.
36.
SchultzP. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective-taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391-406.
37.
SchultzP. W. (2001). Assessing the structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 1-13.
38.
SchultzP. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human–nature relations. In SchmuckP.SchultzW. P. (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61-78). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
39.
SchultzP. W.ShriverC.TabanicoJ. J.KhazianA. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31-42.
40.
StedmanR. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment & Behavior, 34, 561-581.
41.
StedmanR. C. (2003). Sense of place and forest science: Toward a program of quantitative research. Forest Science, 49, 822-829.
42.
StegL.DreijerinkL.AbrahamseW. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415-425.
43.
SternP. C.DietzT.KalofL.GuagnanoG. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1611-1636.
44.
StiegerJ. H.LindJ. C. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
45.
StokolsD.ShumakerS. A. (1981). People and places: A transactional view of settings. In HarveyJ. (Ed.), Cognition, social behaviour and the environment (pp. 441-488). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
TuanY. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
47.
VaskeJ. J.DonnellyM. P. (1999). A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society & Natural Resources, 12, 523-537.
48.
VaskeJ. J.KobrinK. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 26-53.
49.
VorkinnM.RieseH. (2001). Environmental concern in a local context: The significance of place attachment. Environment & Behavior, 33, 249-263.
50.
WilliamsD. R.PattersonM. E.RoggenbuckJ. W.WatsonA. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14, 29-46.
51.
WynveenC. J.KyleG. T.AbsherJ. D.TheodoriG. L. (2008, October). Environmental worldview and place attachment toward protected areas. Paper presented at Abstracts from the 2008 Leisure Research Symposium, Baltimore, MD.
52.
WynveenC. J.KyleG. T.SuttonS. G. (2010). Place meanings ascribed to marine settings: The case of the Great Barrier Reef marine park. Leisure Sciences, 32, 270-287.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
