Happiness and Feeling Connected

Abstract

Subjective connection with nature, or nature relatedness, is similar to other environmental worldview measures in predicting sustainable attitudes and behaviors, yet is unique in predicting happiness. In two studies, the authors assessed the overlap between nature relatedness and other subjective connections (e.g., with friends or country) and examined these connections as a possible confound in explaining the link between nature relatedness and happiness. Study 1 adapted a measure of general connectedness and administered it to student (n = 331) and community (n = 415) samples along with multiple nature relatedness and happiness indicators. Study 2 examined more established measures of subjective connections in another community sample (n = 204). General connectedness predicted happiness well, yet nature relatedness remained a significant distinct predictor of many happiness indicators, even after controlling for other connections. Results support the notion that nature relatedness could be a path to human happiness and environmental sustainability, though confirming this causal direction requires additional research.

Keywords

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aron

E. N.

Smollan

(1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.

Berman

M. G.

Jonides

Kaplan

(2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207-1212.

Bragg

E. A.

(1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 93-108.

Brown

K. W.

Kasser

(2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74, 349-368.

Buhrmester

Kwang

Gosling

S. D.

(2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.

Cervinka

Röderer

Hefler

(2012). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 379-388.

Cheek

J. M.

Smith

S. M.

Tropp

L. R.

(2002, February). Relational identity orientation: A fourth scale for the AIQ. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Savannah, GA.

Conn

(1998). Living in the earth: Ecopsychology, health and psychotherapy. Humanistic Psychologist, 26, 179-198.

Corral-Verdugo

Mireles-Acosta

Tapia-Fonllem

Fraijo-Sing

(2011). Happiness as a correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Human Ecology Review, 18, 95-104.

10.

Diener

(2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national indicator. American Psychologist, 55, 34-43.

11.

Diener

Emmons

R. A.

Larsen

R. J.

Griffin

(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

12.

Diener

Seligman

M. E. P.

(2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81-84.

13.

Dutcher

D. D.

Finley

J. C.

Luloff

A. E.

Buttolph Johnson

(2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474-493.

14.

Ersner-Hershfield

Wimmer

Knutson

(2009). Saving for the future self: Neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 85-92.

15.

Feral

C. H.

(1998). The connectedness model and optimal development: Is ecopsychology the answer to emotional well-being? Humanistic Psychologist, 26, 243-274.

16.

Frantz

C. M.

Mayer

F. S.

(2009). The emergency of climate change: Why are we failing to take action? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 205-222.

17.

Frumkin

(2001). Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 234-240.

18.

Hays

R. D.

DiMatteo

M. R.

(1987). A short-form measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 69-81.

19.

Hazan

Shaver

(1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.

20.

Howell

A. J.

Dopko

R. L.

Passmore

Buro

(2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166-171.

21.

Kals

Schumacher

Montada

(1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178-202.

22.

Kaplan

(1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Kaplan

Berman

M. G.

(2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 43-57.

24.

Kellert

S. R.

(1997). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development. Washington, DC: Island Press.

25.

Kuo

F. E.

Sullivan

W. C.

(2001a). Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33, 543-571.

26.

Kuo

F. E.

Sullivan

W. C.

(2001b). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33, 343-367.

27.

Leary

M. R.

Tipsord

J. M.

Tate

E. B.

(2008). Allo-inclusive identity: Incorporating the social and natural worlds into one’s sense of self. In Wayment

Bauer

(Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 137-147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

28.

Lyubomirsky

Lepper

H. S.

(1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155.

29.

Malone

G. P.

Pillow

D. R.

Osman

(2011). The General Belongingness Scale (GBS): Assessing achieved belongingness. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 311-316.

30.

Markowitz

E. M.

Goldberg

L. R.

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

(2012). Profiling the “pro-environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80, 81-111.

31.

Mayer

S. F.

Frantz

C. M.

(2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503-515.

32.

Mayer

S. F.

Frantz

C. M.

Bruehlman-Senecal

Dolliver

(2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607-643.

33.

Mitchell

Popham

(2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study. Lancet, 372, 1655-1660.

34.

Nisbet

E. K.

Zelenski

J. M.

(2011a, June). Bridging sustainability and well-being with the NR-6, a brief new measure of nature relatedness. Paper presented at the 72nd Annual Convention of Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

35.

Nisbet

E. K.

Zelenski

J. M.

(2011b). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22, 1101-1106.

36.

Nisbet

E. K.

Zelenski

J. M.

Murphy

S. A.

(2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715-740.

37.

Nisbet

E. K.

Zelenski

J. M.

Murphy

S. A.

(2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 303-322.

38.

O’Brien

(2008). Sustainable happiness: How happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Canadian Psychology, 49, 289-295.

39.

Radloff

L. S.

(1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.

40.

Ryan

R. M.

Frederick

(1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 528-565.

41.

Ryff

C. D.

(1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.

42.

Saunders

C. D.

(2003). The emerging field of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10, 137-149.

43.

Schultz

P. W.

(2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Schmuck

Schultz

W. P.

(Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 62-78). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

44.

Singelis

T. M.

(1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.

45.

Tropp

L. R.

Wright

S. C.

(2001). Ingroup identification as inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585-600.

46.

Van den Berg

A. E.

(2005). Health impacts of healing environments: A review of evidence for benefits of nature, daylight, fresh air, and quiet in healthcare settings. Groningen, Netherlands: Foundation 200 years University Hospital Groningen.

47.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

Tellegen

(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.

48.

Waugh

C. E.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of new relationships. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 93-106.

49.

Weinstein

Przybylski

A. K.

Ryan

R. M.

(2009). Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1315-1329.

50.

Wilson

E. O.

(1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.