This study examined how proximity and attractiveness of public open spaces (POSs), perceptions of the surrounding built environment, and street configuration were associated with walking to and within POSs. Residents from three neighborhoods in Melbourne (N = 335) completed a questionnaire about walking and perceptions of their neighborhood, and geographic information systems and space syntax measures were used to assess proximity of POSs and street configuration. Proximity and attractiveness of POSs were not associated with POS-related walking. However, several perceptual qualities of the built environment, including safety from crime and traffic and aesthetics, were associated with greater walking. As well, persons living in areas with the most integrated street configurations reported less POS-related walking. Neighborhood perceptions and street configuration are key urban design issues to consider in promoting residents’ use of POS for walking.
AdamsM. A.RyanS.KerrJ.SallisJ. F.PatrickK.FrankL. D.NormanG. J. (2009). Validation of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (news) items using geographic information systems. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 6, S113-S123.
2.
AlfonzoM.BoarnetM. G.DayK.McMillanT.AndersonC. L. (2008). The relationship of neighbourhood built environment features and adult parents’ walking. Journal of Urban Design, 13, 29-51.
3.
ApparicioP.AbdelmajidM.RivaM.ShearmurR. (2008). Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7, 1-14.
4.
ArvidssonD.KawakamiN.OhlssonH.SundquistK. (2012). Physical activity and concordance between objective and perceived walkability. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44, 280-287.
5.
AspinallP. A.Ward ThompsonC.AlvesS.SugiyamaT.BriceR.VickersA. (2010). Preference and relative importance for environmental attributes of neighbourhood open space in older people. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37, 1022-1039.
6.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Census of population and housing: Socio-economic indexes for areas (seifa), 2006, Australia (Catalogue no. 2033.0.55.001). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
7.
Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology. (2003). Ospace metadata: Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology. Melbourne: Author.
8.
BadlandH. M.SchofieldG. M.GarrettN. (2008). Travel behavior and objectively measured urban design variables: Associations for adults traveling to work. Health & Place, 14, 85-95.
9.
BafnaS. (2003). Space syntax. Environment and Behavior, 35, 17-29.
10.
BallK.JefferyR. W.CrawfordD. A.RobertsR. J.SalmonJ.TimperioA. F. (2008). Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments. Preventive Medicine, 47, 294-298.
11.
BaranP. K.RodríguezD. A.KhattakA. J. (2008). Space syntax and walking in a new urbanist and suburban neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design, 13, 5-28.
12.
Bedimo-RungA. L.MowenA. J.CohenD. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 159-168.
13.
BerriganD.PickleL.DillJ. (2010). Associations between street connectivity and active transportation. International Journal of Health Geographics, 9, 1-18.
14.
BoehmerT. K.HoehnerC. M.WyrwichK. W.Brennan RamirezL. K.BrownsonR. C. (2006). Correspondence between perceived and observed measures of neighborhood environmental supports for physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 3, 22-36.
15.
Boone-HeinonenJ.PopkinB. M.SongY.Gordon-LarsenP. (2010). What neighborhood area captures built environment features related to adolescent physical activity?Health & Place, 16, 1280-1286.
16.
BrownsonR. C.ChangJ. J.EylerA. A.AinsworthB. E.KirtlandK. A.SaelensB. E.SallisJ. F. (2004). Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: A comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 473-483.
17.
BrownsonR. C.HoehnerC. M.DayK.ForsythA.SallisJ. F. (2009). Measuring the built environment for physical activity: State of the science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36, S99-S123.e112.
CaoX.HandyS.MokhtarianP. (2006). The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation, 33, 1-20.
20.
CaoX.MokhtarianP. L.HandyS. L. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 29, 359-395.
21.
CarnegieM. A.BaumanA.MarshallA. L.MohsinM.Westley-WiseV.BoothM. L. (2002). Perceptions of the physical environment, stage of change for physical activity, and walking among Australian adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 146-155.
22.
CerinE.FrankL. D.SallisJ. F.SaelensB. E.ConwayT. L.ChapmanJ. E.GlanzK. (2011). From neighborhood design and food options to residents’ weight status. Appetite, 56, 693-703.
23.
CerinE.LeslieE.OwenN.BaumanA. (2008). An Australian version of the neighborhood environment walkability scale: Validity evidence. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 12, 31-51.
24.
CerinE.SaelensB. E.SallisJ. F.FrankL. D. (2006). Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: Validity and development of a short form. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38, 1682-1691.
25.
ChinG. K. W.Van NielK. P.Giles-CortiB.KnuimanM. (2008). Accessibility and connectivity in physical activity studies: The impact of missing pedestrian data. Preventive Medicine, 46, 41-45.
26.
ClelandV. J.TimperioA.CrawfordD. (2008). Are perceptions of the physical and social environment associated with mothers’ walking for leisure and for transport? A longitudinal study. Preventive Medicine, 47, 188-193.
27.
CohenD. A.McKenzieT. L.SehgalA.WilliamsonS.GolinelliD.LurieN. (2007). Contribution of public parks to physical activity. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 509-514.
28.
ComberA.BrunsdonC.GreenE. (2008). Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86, 103-114.
29.
CraigC. L.MarshallA. L.SjöströmM.BaumanA. E.BoothM. L.AinsworthB. E.. . . OjaP. (2003). International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35, 1381-1395.
30.
CrespoC. J.AinsworthB. E.KeteyianS. J.HeathG. W.SmitE. (1999). Prevalence of physical inactivity and its relation to social class in us adults: Results from the third national health and nutrition examination survey. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 31, 1821-1827.
31.
CuttH.KnuimanM.Giles-CortiB. (2008). Does getting a dog increase recreational walking?International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5, 1-10.
32.
Department of Sustainability and Environment. (2009). Vicmap property, vicmap transport: Spatial Information Infrastructure. Victoria, Australia: Author.
33.
DillJ. (2004). Measuring network connectivity for bicycling and walking. Paper presented at the “Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board,”Washington, DC.
34.
DuncanM. J.SpenceJ. C.MummeryW. K. (2005). Perceived environment and physical activity: A meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2, 1-9.
35.
EllawayA.MacintyreS.BonnefoyX. (2005). Graffiti, greenery, and obesity in adults: Secondary analysis of European cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 331, 611-612.
36.
FrankL.KerrJ.ChapmanJ.SallisJ. (2007). Urban form relationships with walk trip frequency and distance among youth. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21, 305-311.
37.
FrankL. D.SaelensB. E.PowellK. E.ChapmanJ. E. (2007). Stepping towards causation: Do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity?Social Science & Medicine, 65, 1898-1914.
38.
FrankL. D.SchmidT. L.SallisJ. F.ChapmanJ.SaelensB. E. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from smartraq. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 117-125.
39.
Giles-CortiB.BroomhallM. H.KnuimanM.CollinsC.DouglasK.NgK.. . . DonovanR. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 169-176.
40.
Giles-CortiB.TimperioA.BullF.PikoraT. (2005). Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: Increased specificity for ecological models. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 33, 175-181.
41.
Giles-CortiB.TimperioA.CuttH.PikoraT. J.BullF. C. L.KnuimanM.. . . ShiltonT. (2006). Development of a reliable measure of walking within and outside the local neighborhood: RESIDE’s neighborhood physical activity questionnaire. Preventive Medicine, 42, 455-459.
42.
GómezL. F.ParraD. C.BuchnerD.BrownsonR. C.SarmientoO. L.PinzónJ. D.. . . LobeloF. (2010). Built environment attributes and walking patterns among the elderly population in Bogotá. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38, 592-599.
43.
HandyS.CaoX.MokhtarianP. (2008). Neighborhood design and children’s outdoor play: Evidence from northern California. Children, Youth and Environments, 18, 160-179.
44.
HarrisonR. A.GemmellI.HellerR. F. (2007). The population effect of crime and neighbourhood on physical activity: An analysis of 15461 adults. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 34-39.
45.
HillierB. (2004). Can streets be made safe?Urban Design International, 9, 31-45.
46.
HillierB.HansonJ. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
HillierB.HansonJ.GrahamH. (1987). Ideas are in things: An application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 14, 363-385.
48.
HillsdonM.PanterJ.FosterC.JonesA. (2006). The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health, 120, 1127-1132.
49.
HinoA. A. F.ReisR. S.ParraD. C.BrownsonR. C.FerminoR. C. (2010). Using observational methods to evaluate public open spaces and physical activity in Brazil. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7, S146-S154.
50.
HoehnerC. M.Brennan RamirezL. K.ElliottM. B.HandyS. L.BrownsonR. C. (2005). Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 105-116.
51.
HullE. E.RofeyD. L.RobertsonR. J.NagleE. F.OttoA. D.AaronD. J. (2010). Influence of marriage and parenthood on physical activity: A 2-year prospective analysis. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7, 577-583.
52.
HumpelN.OwenN.IversonD.LeslieE.BaumanA. (2004). Perceived environment attributes, residential location, and walking for particular purposes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26, 119-125.
53.
InoueS.MuraseN.ShimomitsuT.OhyaY.OdagiriY.TakamiyaT.. . . SallisJ. F. (2009). Association of physical activity and neighborhood environment among Japanese adults. Preventive Medicine, 48, 321-325.
54.
InoueS.OhyaY.OdagiriY.TakamiyaT.IshiiK.KitabayashiM.. . . ShimomitsuT. (2010). Association between perceived neighborhood environment and walking among adults in 4 cities in Japan. Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 277-286.
55.
JacobsenP. L.RacioppiF.RutterH. (2009). Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling. Injury Prevention, 15, 369-373.
56.
JanssenI.BoyceW. F.SimpsonK.PickettW. (2006). Influence of individual- and area-level measures of socioeconomic status on obesity, unhealthy eating, and physical inactivity in Canadian adolescents. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 83, 139-145.
57.
JiangB.ClaramuntC.KlarqvistB. (2000). An integration of space syntax into GIS for modelling urban spaces. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2, 161-171.
58.
JilcottS. B.EvensonK. R.LaraiaB. A.AmmermanA. S. (2007). Association between physical activity and proximity to physical activity resources among low-income, midlife women. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4, 1-16.
59.
KaczynskiA. T. (2010). Neighborhood walkability perceptions: Associations with amount of neighborhood-based physical activity by intensity and purpose. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7, 3-10.
60.
KaczynskiA. T.HendersonK. A. (2008). Parks and recreation settings and active living: A review of associations with physical activity function and intensity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5, 619-632.
61.
KaczynskiA. T.MowenA. J. (2011). Does self-selection influence the relationship between park availability and physical activity?Preventive Medicine, 52, 23-25.
62.
KaczynskiA. T.PotwarkaL. R.SaelensB. E. (2008). Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1451-1456.
63.
KaczynskiA. T.PotwarkaL. R.SmaleB. J. A.HavitzM. E. (2009). Association of parkland proximity with neighborhood and park-based physical activity: Variations by gender and age. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31, 174-191.
64.
KavanaghA. M.GollerJ. L.KingT.JolleyD.CrawfordD.TurrellG. (2005). Urban area disadvantage and physical activity: A multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 934-940.
65.
KimY. O.PennA. (2004). Linking the spatial syntax of cognitive maps to the spatial syntax of the environment. Environment and Behavior, 36, 483-504.
66.
KlarqvistB. (1993). A space syntax glossary. Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, 2, 11-12.
67.
KostakosV. (2010). Space syntax and pervasive systems. In JiangB. (Ed.), Geospatial analysis and modelling of urban structure and dynamics (pp. 31-52). New York, NY: Springer.
68.
LackeyK.KaczynskiA. (2009). Correspondence of perceived vs. objective proximity to parks and their relationship to park-based physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 6, 1-9.
69.
LeckE. (2006). The impact of urban form on travel behavior: A meta-analysis. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19, 37-58.
70.
LeeC. (2004). Activity-friendly communities: Correlates of transportation or recreation walking, and correlates of physical activity for different sub-populations. Washington, DC: Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington.
71.
LeeC.MoudonA. V. (2006). Correlates of walking for transportation or recreation purposes. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 6, S77-S98.
72.
LeeC.MoudonA. V. (2008). Neighbourhood design and physical activity. Building Research & Information, 36, 395-411.
73.
LeslieE.SaelensB.FrankL.OwenN.BaumanA.CoffeeN.HugoG. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: A pilot study. Health & Place, 11, 227-236.
74.
LiF.FisherK. J.BrownsonR. C.BosworthM. (2005). Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 558-564.
75.
LimaJ. J. (2001). Socio-spatial segregation and urban form: Belém at the end of the 1990s. Geoforum, 32, 493-507.
76.
LinL.MoudonA. V. (2010). Objective versus subjective measures of the built environment, which are most effective in capturing associations with walking?Health & Place, 16, 339-348.
77.
LitmanT. A. (2011). Land use impacts on transport: How land use factors affect travel behavior: Victoria Transport Institute. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/landtravel.pdf
78.
LovasiG.MoudonA.PearsonA.HurvitzP.LarsonE.SiscovickD.. . . PsatyB. M. (2008). Using built environment characteristics to predict walking for exercise. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7, 1-13.
79.
MacintyreS.MacdonaldL.EllawayA. (2008). Lack of agreement between measured and self-reported distance from public green parks in Glasgow, Scotland. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5, 1-8.
McConvilleM. E.RodríguezD. A.CliftonK.ChoG.FleischhackerS. (2011). Disaggregate land uses and walking. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40, 25-32.
82.
McCormackG. R.CerinE.LeslieE.Du ToitL.OwenN. (2008). Objective versus perceived walking distances to destinations. Environment and Behavior, 40, 401-425.
83.
McGinnA.EvensonK.HerringA.HustonS.RodriguezD. (2007). Exploring associations between physical activity and perceived and objective measures of the built environment. Journal of Urban Health, 84, 162-184.
84.
MecredyG.PickettW.JanssenI. (2011). Street connectivity is negatively associated with physical activity in Canadian youth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8, 3333-3350.
85.
MokhtarianP. L.CaoX. (2008). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42, 204-228.
86.
MoodyJ. S.ProchaskaJ. J.SallisJ. F.McKenzieT. L.BrownM.ConwayT. L. (2004). Viability of parks and recreation centers as sites for youth physical activity promotion. Health Promotion Practice, 5, 438-443.
87.
MoudonA. V.LeeC.CheadleA. D.GarvinC.JohnsonD.SchmidT. L.. . . LinL. (2006). Operational definition of walkable neighborhood: Theoretical and empirical insights. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3, S99-S117.
88.
NichollsS. (2001). Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: A case study using GIS. Managing Leisure, 6, 201-219.
89.
OakesJ. M.ForsythA.SchmitzK. (2007). The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: The twin cities walking study. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 4, 16.
90.
OwenN.HumpelN.LeslieE.BaumanA.SallisJ. (2004). Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, 67-76.
91.
OzbilA.PeponisJ.StoneB. (2011). Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows. Urban Design International, 16, 125-141.
92.
ParraD. C.HoehnerC. M.HallalP. C.RibeiroI. C.ReisR.BrownsonR. C.. . . SimoesE. J. (2011). Perceived environmental correlates of physical activity for leisure and transportation in Curitiba, Brazil. Preventive Medicine, 52, 234-238.
93.
PearceJ.MaddisonR. (2011). Do enhancements to the urban built environment improve physical activity levels among socially disadvantaged populations?International Journal for Equity in Health, 10, 28. Retrieved from http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/10/1/28
94.
PennA. (2003). Space syntax and spatial cognition. Environment and Behavior, 35, 30-65.
95.
PennA.HillierB.BanisterD.XuJ. (1998). Configurational modeling of urban movement networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 59-84.
96.
PeponisJ.WinemanJ. (2002). Spatial structure of environment and behavior. In BechtelR. B.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 271-291). New York, NY: John Wiley.
97.
RattiC. (2004). Urban texture and space syntax: Some inconsistencies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 487-499.
98.
RiesA. V.VoorheesC. C.RocheK. M.GittelsohnJ.YanA. F.AstoneN. M. (2009). A quantitative examination of park characteristics related to park use and physical activity among urban youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, S64-S70.
99.
RoemmichJ. N.EpsteinL. H.RajaS.YinL.RobinsonJ.WiniewiczD. (2006). Association of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children. Preventive Medicine, 43, 437-441.
100.
RossC. E.MirowskyJ. (2008). Neighborhood socioeconomic status and health: Context or composition?City & Community, 7, 163-179.
101.
RouxA. V. D.EvensonK. R.McGinnA. P.BrownD. G.MooreL.BrinesS.JacobsD. R.Jr. (2007). Availability of recreational resources and physical activity in adults. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 493-499.
102.
RundleA.FieldS.ParkY.FreemanL.WeissC. C.NeckermanK. (2008). Personal and neighborhood socioeconomic status and indices of neighborhood walk-ability predict body mass index in New York City. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 1951-1958.
103.
SaelensB. E.HandyS. (2008). Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40, S550-S566.
104.
SaelensB. E.SallisJ. F.BlackJ. B.ChenD. (2003). Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1552-1558.
105.
SaelensB. E.SallisJ. F.FrankL. D. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 80-91.
106.
SallisJ. F.KerrJ. (2006). Physical activity and the built environment. Research Digest, 7, 1-7.
107.
SallisJ. F.OwenN.FisherE. B. (2008). Ecological models of health behavior. In GlanzK.RimerB.K.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (4th ed.) (pp. 465-485). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
108.
SallisJ. F.SaelensB. E. (2000). Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, S1-S14.
109.
ShigematsuR.SallisJ.ConwayT.SaelensB.FrankL.CainK.. . . KingA. C. (2009). Age differences in the relation of perceived neighborhood environment to walking. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41, 314-321.
110.
ShishehborM. H.Gordon-LarsenP.KiefeC. I.LitakerD. (2008). Association of neighborhood socioeconomic status with physical fitness in healthy young adults: The coronary artery risk development in young adults (cardia) study. American Heart Journal, 155, 699-705.
111.
SjogrenK.HanssonE.StjernbergL. (2011). Parenthood and factors that influence outdoor recreational physical activity from a gender perspective. BMC Public Health, 11, 1-9.
112.
SouthworthM.Ben-JosephE. (2003). Streets and the shaping of towns and cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
113.
SpottsD.StynesD. (1984). Public awareness and knowledge of urban parks: A case study. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 2(4), 1-12.
114.
StanisS. A. W.SchneiderI. E.PereiraM. A. (2010). Parks and health: Differences in constraints and negotiation strategies for park-based leisure time physical activity by stage of change. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7, 273-284.
115.
SugiyamaT.FrancisJ.MiddletonN. J.OwenN.Giles-CortiB. (2010). Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1752-1757.
116.
SugiyamaT.Ward ThompsonC. (2008). Associations between characteristics of neighbourhood open space and older people’s walking. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7, 41-51.
117.
TimperioA.Giles-CortiB.CrawfordD.AndrianopoulosN.BallK.SalmonJ.. . . HumeC. (2008). Features of public open spaces and physical activity among children: Findings from the clan study. Preventive Medicine, 47, 514-518.
118.
Transportation Research Board & Institute of Medicine. (2005). Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
119.
TropedP. J.SaundersR. P.PateR. R.ReiningerB.AddyC. L. (2003). Correlates of recreational and transportation physical activity among adults in a new England community. Preventive Medicine, 37, 304-310.
120.
TropedP. J.WilsonJ. S.MatthewsC. E.CromleyE. K.MellyS. J. (2010). The built environment and location-based physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38, 429-438.
121.
VaughanL. (2007). The spatial syntax of urban segregation. Progress in Planning, 67, 205-294.
122.
VeitchJ.SalmonJ.BallK. (2010). Individual, social and physical environmental correlates of children’s active free-play: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7, 1-10.
123.
VeitchJ.TimperioA.CrawfordD.AbbottG.Giles-CortiB.SalmonJ. (2011). Is the neighbourhood environment associated with sedentary behaviour outside of school hours among children?Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 41, 333-341.
124.
WallmannB.BuckschJ.FroboeseI. (2011). The association between physical activity and perceived environment in German adults. European Journal of Public Health. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr069
125.
WeissR. L.MaantayJ. A.FahsM. (2010). Promoting active urban aging: A measurement approach to neighborhood walkability for older adults. Cities and the Environment, 3, 1-17.
126.
WilsonL. A.Giles-CortiB.BurtonN. W.GiskesK.HaynesM.TurrellG. (2011). The association between objectively measured neighborhood features and walking in middle-aged adults. American Journal of Health Promotion, 25, e12-e21.
127.
WinemanJ. D.KaboF. W.DavisG. F. (2009). Spatial and social networks in organizational innovation. Environment and Behavior, 41, 427-442.
128.
WittenK.ExeterD.FieldA. (2003). The quality of urban environments: Mapping variation in access to community resources. Urban Studies, 40, 161-177.
129.
WittenK.HiscockR.PearceJ.BlakelyT. (2008). Neighbourhood access to open spaces and the physical activity of residents: A national study. Preventive Medicine, 47, 299-303.
130.
YenI. H.KaplanG. A. (1998). Poverty area residence and changes in physical activity level: Evidence from the alameda county study. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1709-1712.
