Both children and adults benefit from living in communities and neighborhoods that are rich in social capital. However, the research literature is relatively silent with respect to the influence that children may play as catalysts for the formation and maintenance of community or family stocks of social capital. This article investigates whether having dependent children living at home play a role in forging adult connections, community involvement, and social capital in a suburban context. The qualitative data were derived from 12 focus groups and the quantitative data from a survey of 339 residents in three Western Australian suburbs. Overall, the quantitative results found that social capital, neighborhood cohesion, and community participation were all significantly higher among respondents with dependent children living at home. The results have implications for urban design and community infrastructure, including the extent to which the built environment caters for children and fosters social connectedness among parents, families, and the broader community.
AguileraM. (2002). The impact of social capital on labor force participation: Evidence from the 2000 Social Capital Benchmark Survey. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 853-875.
2.
AinsworthJ. W. (2002). Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement. Social Forces, 81, 117-152.
3.
AllattP. (1993). Becoming privileged: the role of family process. In BatesI. R.BuckinghamG. (Eds.), Youth and inequality (pp. 139-159). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
4.
AlmedomA. M. (2005). Social capital and mental health: An interdisciplinary review of primary evidence. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 943-964.
5.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2002). 2001 Census basic community profile and snapshot: Western Australia. Canberra: Author.
6.
BaumF.PalmerC. (2002). Opportunity structures: Urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia. Health Promotion International, 17, 351-361.
7.
Bedimo-RungA. L.MowenA. J.CohenD. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(Suppl. 2), 159-168.
8.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
9.
BoyatzisR. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. New York, NY: SAGE.
10.
BruegelI.WarrenS. (2003). Family resources and community social capital as routes to valued employment in the UK?Social Policy and Society, 2, 319-328.
11.
BucknerJ. C. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 771-791.
12.
ColemanJ. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
14.
EasthopeH.JuddS. (2010). Living Well in Greater Density. Sydney: City Futures Research Centre, Faculty of the Built Environment, University of New South Wales.
15.
EddyJ.HartL. A.BoltzR. P. (1988). The effects of service dogs on social acknowledgments of people in wheelchairs. Journal of Psychology, 122, 39-45.
16.
FollandS. (2007). Does “community social capital” contribute to population health?Social Science & Medicine, 64, 2342-2354.
17.
FoneD.DunstanF.LloydK.WilliamsG.WatkinsJ.PalmerS. (2007). Does social cohesion modify the association between area income deprivation and mental health? A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36, 338-345.
18.
FullanM.WatsonN.LeithwoodK. (2003). What should be the boundaries of the schools we need?Education Canada, 43, 12-15.
19.
FurediF. (2001). Paranoid parenting: In making sense of parental paranoia. London, England: Allen Lane.
20.
GoddardR. D. (2003). Relational networks, social trust, and norms: A social capital perspective on students’ chances of academic success. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 59-74.
21.
GrantJ. (2006). Planning the good community: New urbanism in theory and practice (Vol. 9). London, England: Taylor & Francis.
22.
HandyS.PatersonR. G.ButlerK. S. (2003). Planning for street connectivity: Getting from here to there. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
23.
Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government. (2000). The social capital community benchmark Saguaro seminar. Civic engagement in America. Retrieved from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/saguaro/communitysurvey
24.
HaweP.ShiellA. (2000). Social capital and health promotion: A review. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 871-885.
25.
HyyppaM. T.MakiJ. (2003). Social participation and health in a community rich in stock of social capital. Health Education Research, 18, 770-779.
26.
JacobsJ. (1961). The death and life of the great American cities. New York, NY: Random House.
27.
KatcherA. H.BeckA. M. (1983). New perspectives on our lives with companion animals. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
28.
KawachiI.KennedyB.LochnerK.ProthrowstithD. (1997). Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1491-1498.
29.
KleinbaumD.KleinM. (2002). Logistic regression: A self-learning text (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
30.
LangR.HornburgS. (1998). What is social capital and why is it important to public policy?Housing Policy Debate, 9, 1-16.
31.
LavrakasP. (1993). Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection and supervision (Applied Social Research Methods Series 7). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
32.
LeBlancW. (1999). Naked motherhood: Shattering illusions and sharing truths. Sydney, Australia: Random House.
33.
LeydenK. M. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1546-1551.
34.
LochnerK.KawachiI.KennedyB. (1999). Social capital: A guide to its measurement. Health & Place, 5, 259-270.
35.
MacintyreS.EllawayA. (2000). Neighborhood cohesion and health in socially contrasting neighborhoods: Implications for the social exclusion and public health agendas. Health Bulletin, 58, 450-456.
36.
MayoJ. M. (1979). Effects of street forms on suburban neighboring behavior. Environment and Behavior, 11, 375-397.
37.
McCullochA. (2003). An examination of social capital and social disorganisation in neighbourhoods in the British household panel study. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1425-1438.
McLeroyK.BibeauD.StecklerA.GlanzK. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351-377.
40.
McNicholasJ.CollisG. (2000). Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. British Journal of Psychology, 91(Pt 1), 61-70.
41.
MessentP. (1983). Social facilitation of contact with other people by pet dogs. In KatcherA.BeckA. (Eds.), New perspectives on our lives with companion animals (pp. 37-46). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
42.
ModraC.BaumF.CookeR.MurrayC.BushR.CoxE. (1998). Exploring social capital-levels of participation, trust and health in a suburban region of Adelaide, South Australia. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Public Health Association Conference, Hobart, Australia.
43.
MorrowV. (1999). Conceptualizing social capital in relation to the well-being of children and young people: A critical review. Sociological Review, 47, 744-765.
44.
OnyxJ.BullenP. (1997). Measuring social capital in five communities in NSW: An analysis. Sydney, Australia: University of Technology.
45.
PutnamR. D. (2001). Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
46.
PutnamR. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS:Political Science and Politics, 28(4), 664-683.
47.
RunyanD. K.HunterW. M.SocolarR. R. S.Amaya-JacksonL.EnglishD.LandsverkJ.. . .MathewR. M. (1998). Children who prosper in unfavorable environments: The relationship to social capital. Pediatrics, 101(1 Pt. 1), 12-18.
48.
SatoriusN. (2003). Social capital and mental health. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 16(Suppl. 2), S101-S105.
49.
Schaefer-McDanielN. J. (2004). Conceptualizing social capital among young people: Toward a new theory. Children, Youth and Environments, 14, 140-150.
50.
SubramanianL.LochnerK.KawachiS. (2003). Neighborhood differences in social capital: A compositional artifact or a contextual construct. Health & Place, 9, 33-44.
51.
WallE.FerrazziG.SchryerF. (1998). Getting the goods on social capital. Rural Sociology, 63, 300-322.
52.
WhitleyR.McKenzieK. (2005). Social capital and psychiatry: Review of the literature. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 13, 71-84.
53.
WoodL. (2006). Social capital, mental health and the environments in which people live (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Western Australia, Perth.
54.
WoodL.Giles-CortiB.BulsaraM. (2005). The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital?Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1159-1173.
55.
WoodL.Giles-CortiB.BulsaraM.BoschD. (2007). More than a furry companion: The ripple effect of companion animals on neighborhood interactions and sense of communitySociety & Animals, 15, 43-56.
56.
WoodL.ShannonT.BulsaraM.PikoraT.McCormackG.Giles-CortiB. (2008). The anatomy of the safe and social suburb: An exploratory study of the built environment, social capital and residents’ perceptions of safety. Health & Place, 14, 15-31.
57.
WoolcockM. (2004). Why and how planners should take social capital seriously. In HutchinsonJ. (Ed.), Using social capital to help integrate planning theory, research and practice (p. 183). Chicago, IL: Journal of the American Planning Association.
58.
ZierschA. M.BaumF. E.MacDougallC.PutlandC. (2005). Neighborhood life and social capital: The implications for health. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 71-86.
