This article reports findings from three experiments, covering 46 environments and 66 participants, on how strongly four properties of the physical environment influence perceived spaciousness.The properties were horizontal area, boundary height, elongation, and color. Ten original findings were reported. Overall, horizontal area had the strongest effect on perceived spaciousness (r = .60; more floor area increases perceived spaciousness), followed by height (r = —.22; lower boundaries increase perceived spaciousness). The effect of color on perceived spaciousness, when amount of light is controlled, was much smaller (r = .14). Findings for elongation were different for concave and convex spaces (r’s of —.22 and +.26). Quantitative syntheses of the current work with previous work are presented, as is numerical guidance for cost-effective future work.
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Bax, L., Yu, L.M., Ikeda, N., Tsuruta, H., & Moons, K.G.M. ( 2006). Development and validation of MIX: Comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, 50.
3.
Bax, L., Yu, L.M., Ikeda, N., Tsuruta, H., & Moons, K.G.M. ( 2008). MIX: Comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data (Version 1.7). Retrieved November 23, 2009, from http://mix-for-meta-analysis.info
4.
Benedikt, M.L., & Burnham, C.A. ( 1985). Perceiving architectural space: From optic arrays to isovists. In W. H. Warren & R. E. Shaw (Eds.), Persistence and change (pp. 103-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Calthorpe, P., & Fulton, W. ( 2001).The regional city. Washington, DC: Island Press.
6.
Cochran, W.G., & Cox, G.M. ( 1957). Experimental designs. New York: John Wiley.
7.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
8.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. ( 1993). Applied regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Durston, D., & Mizuno, K. ( 2002). Kyoto: Seven paths to the heart of the city. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
10.
Feimer, N.R. ( 1984). Environmental perception: The effects of media, evaluative context, and observer sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 4, 61-80.
11.
Franz, G., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2003). An empirical approach to the experience of architectural space in VR. Retrieved December 23, 2004, from http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/publications/pdfs/pdf2232.pdf
12.
Franz, G., & Wiener, J.M. ( 2005). Exploring isovist-based correlates of spatial behavior and experience. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3343, 42-57.
13.
Gärling, T. ( 1970a). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms III: A relation between judged depth and size of space. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 124-131.
14.
Gärling, T. ( 1970b). Studies in visual perception of architectural spaces and rooms IV: The relation of judged depth to judged size of space under different viewing conditions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 133-145.
15.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. ( 1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
16.
Imamoglu, V. ( 1973). The effect of furniture on the subjective evaluation of spaciousness and estimation of size of rooms. In R. Küller (Ed.), Architectural psychology (pp. 314-352). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
17.
International City Management Association. ( 2003). Getting to smart growth II: 100 more policies for implementation . Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
18.
Inui, M., & Miyata, T. ( 1973). Spaciousness in interiors. Lighting Research and Technology, 5, 103-111.
19.
Ishikawa, T., Okabe, A., Sadahiro, Y., & Kakumoto, S. ( 1998). An experimental analysis of the perceptions of the area using 3-D stereo dynamic graphics. Environment and Behavior , 30, 216-234.
20.
Kirschbaum, C.F., & Tonello, G. ( 1997). Visual appearance of office lighting. Right Light, 1, 143-148.
21.
Martyniuk, O., Flynn, J.E., Spencer, T.J., & Hendrick, C. ( 1973). Effect of environmental lighting on impression and behavior . In R. Küller (Ed.), Architectural psychology (pp. 51-63). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
22.
Meier, R.L. ( 1975). Planning for an urban world: The design of resource-conserving cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
23.
Palmer, J.F., & Hoffman, R.E. ( 2001). Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 149-161.
24.
Pascale, D. ( 2003). A review of color spaces from xyY to R’G’B’ . Montreal: The BabelColor Company .
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. ( 1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis . New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Sadalla, E.K., & Oxley, D. ( 1984). The perception of room size: The rectangularity illusion . Environment and Behavior, 16, 291-306.
28.
Stamps, A.E. ( 1992). Bootstrap investigation of respondent sample size for environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 220-222.
29.
Stamps, A.E. ( 1996). Effect sizes as a lingua franca of environmental aesthetics . In J. L. Nasar & B. Brown (Eds.), Public and private spaces: EDRA 27 (pp. 151-162). Salt Lake City, UT: Environmental Design Research Association.
30.
Stamps, A.E. ( 1997a). Advances in peer review research: An introduction. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 3-10.
31.
Stamps, A.E. ( 1997b). Using a dialectical scientific brief in peer review . Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 85-98.
32.
Stamps, A.E. ( 1999). Demographic effects in environmental preferences: A meta-analysis . Journal of Planning Literature, 14, 155-175.
33.
Stamps, A.E. ( 2000). Psychology and the aesthetics of the built environment . Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
34.
Stamps, A.E. ( 2002). Meta analysis. In R. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), The handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 222-232). New York: John Wiley.
35.
Stamps, A.E. ( 2007). Evaluating spaciousness in static and dynamic media. Design Studies, 28, 535-557.
36.
Stamps, A.E. ( 2009). On shape and spaciousness. Environment and Behavior, 41, 526-548.
37.
Stamps, A.E. ( 2010). Effects of permeability on perceived enclosure and spaciousness . Environment and Behavior, 42, 864-886.
38.
Stamps, A.E., & Krishnan, V.V. (2006). Spaciousness and boundary roughness. Environment and Behavior, 38, 841-872.
39.
Stamps, A.E., & Nasar, J.L. ( 1997). Design review and public preferences: Effects of geographical location, public consensus, sensation seeking, and architectural styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 11-32.
40.
Talen, E. ( 2003). Measuring urbanism: Issues in smart growth research. Journal of Urban Design, 8, 195-315.
41.
Williams, K., Burton, E., & Jenks, M. ( 2000). Achieving urban form. London: E & F Spon.
42.
Wyszecki, G., & Styles, W.S. ( 2000). Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae (2nd ed.). New York : John Wiley.
