Research on noise shows that a variety of effects including stress, annoyance, and performance decrements exist for certain types of sounds. Noise interferes with cognitive ability by overloading the attentional system or simply distracting from efficient encoding or rehearsal, but very little research has extended those findings to recreation or natural environments such as those found in national parks. By exposing participants to one of four soundscape conditions—control, natural, natural with voices, and natural with ground traffic—the current project tested the effect of sound conditions on the recognition and recall of factual information presented whereas viewing scenes of national parks. Both the natural with voices and natural with ground traffic conditions caused significant decreases in memory scores while the natural condition showed no differences from the control condition. Implications for sound management strategies are discussed in the context of current legislation and recent field research. Avenues for future research to clarify the mode of memory interference are discussed.
AasvangG. M., and EngdahlB (2003). Subjective responses to aircraft noise in an outdoor recreational setting: A combined field and laboratory study.Journal of Sound and Vibration, 276, 981–996.
2.
AmbroseS, and BursonS (2004). Soundscape studies in national parks.The George Wright Forum, 21, 29–38.
3.
AnderekK. L., and KnopfR. C. (2007). The relationship between experiences sought, preferred settings, resource conditions, and management preferences in an urban-proximate recreation area.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 25, 39–61.
4.
AydinY, and KaltenbachM (2007). Noise perception, heart rate and blood pressure in relation to aircraft noise in the vicinity of the Frankfurt airport.Clinical Research in Cardiology, 96, 347–358.
5.
BabischW (2003). Stress hormones in the research on cardiovascular effects of noise.Noise and Health, 5, 1–11.
6.
BeamanC. P. (2005). Auditory distraction from low-intensity noise: A review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1041–1064.
7.
BeamanC. P., and JonesD. M. (1997). The role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: Tests of the changing-state hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 459–471.
8.
BellP. A., HessS, HillE, KukasS, RichardsR. W., and SargentD (1984). Noise and context-dependent memory.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 99–100.
9.
BellP. A., MaceB. L., and BenfieldJ. A. (2009). Aircraft overflights at National Parks: Conflict and its potential resolution.Park Science, in press.
10.
BermanM. G., JonidesJ, and KaplanS (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature.Psychological Science, 19, 1207–1212.
11.
BroadbentD. E. (1958). Perception and communication.Oxford: Pergamon.
12.
CacioppoJ. T., and PettyR. E. (1982). The need for cognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
13.
ColleH. A., & WelshA (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17–31.
14.
CowanN (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework.Oxford: Clarendon.
15.
EisenbergerR, SucharskiI. L., YalowitzS, KentR. J., LoomisR. J., JonesJ. R. (2009). The motive for sensory pleasure: Enjoyment of nature and its representation in painting, music, and literature.Journal of Personality, in press.
16.
EllermeierW, EigenstetterM, and ZimmerK (2001). Psychoacoustic correlates of individual noise sensitivity.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1464–1473.
17.
GlassD. C., and SingerJ. E. (1972). Urban stress.New York: Academic Press.
18.
GreenD. M., and FidellS (1991). Variability in the criterion for reporting annoyance in community noise surveys.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 234–243.
19.
HenryW, ErnenweinR, ThompsonH, and OppermanS (2000). Management of commercial air tourism over national parks.USDA Forest Service Proceedings (RMRS-P-14).
20.
HerzogT. R., and BosleyP. J. (1992). Tranquility and preference as affective qualities of natural environments.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 115127.
21.
HoronjeffR. D., KimuraY, MillerN. P., RobertW. E., RosanoC. F., and SanchezG (1993). Acoustic data collected at Grand Canyon, Haleakala, and Hawaii Volcanoes National Parks (USDI Rep. No. 290940.18). Denver, CO: National Park Service.
22.
JonesD. M., and MorrisN (1992). Irrelevant speech and serial recall: Implications fbr theories of attention and working memory.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 33, 212–229.
23.
KryterK. D. (1994). The handbook of learning and effects of noise.San Diego: Academic Press.
24.
MaceB. L., BellP. A., and LoomisR. J. (1999). Aesthetic, affective, and cognitive effects of noise on natural landscape assessment.Society and Natural Resources, 12, 225–242.
25.
MaceB. L., and MarquitJ (2006, June). Six years of mandatory shuttle use in Zion National Park; A longitudinal analysis of the visitor experience. Paper presented in the 14th Internationals Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
26.
MaschkeC, RuppT, and HechtK (2000). The influence of stressors on biochemical reactions—A review of present scientific findings with noise.International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 203, 45–53.
27.
MiedemaH. M. E., and VosH (1999). Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 3336–3344.
28.
MilgramS (1970). The experience of living in cities.Science, 167, 1461–1468.
29.
NewmanP, PilcherE, ManningR, TrevinoK, SavidgeM, and MonroeM (2007). An adaptive approach to managing soundscapes in Muir Woods National Monument: A test of management actions. Paper presented at the meeting of the George Wright Society, St. Paul, MN.
30.
OhC. O., ParkM, and HammittW. E. (2007). Predicting site choice behavior among types of campers.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 25, 23–40.
31.
PilcherE. J., NewmanP, and ManningR. E. (2009). Understanding and managing experiential aspects of soundscapes at Muir Woods National Park.Environmental Management, 43, 425–435.
32.
SalameP, and BaddeleyA. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150–164.
33.
StansfieldS. A., SharpD. S., GallacherJ, and BabischW (1993). Road traffic noise, noise sensitivity, and psychological disorder.Psychological Medicine, 23, 977–985.
34.
StaplesS. L. (1996). Human response to environmental noise.American Psychologist, 51, 143–150.
35.
TaylorS. M. (1984). A path model of aircraft noise annoyance.Journal of Sound and Vibration, 96, 243–260.
36.
WatsonD, and ClarkL. A. (1994). Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule (Expanded form). Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
37.
WeinsteinN (1978). Individual differences in reactions to noise: A longitudinal study in a college dormitory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 458–466.
38.
ZimmerK, and EilermeierW (1999). Psychometric properties of four measures of noise sensitivity: A comparison.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 295–302.
