Much existing research assumes that there is an opposition between mobility and territorial belonging, so that mobile persons tend to have a weak sense of belonging whereas persons with a strong sense of belonging are less willing than others to move. Some studies, however, suggest that mobility may coexist with or even reinforce territorial belonging. This article uses Swedish survey data to introduce two important qualifications to this discussion. First, it shows that different kinds of mobility—daily commuting, long-distance travel, residential mobility, and international migration—are differently related to people's sense of belonging. Second, by examining local, regional, national, and European belonging, it shows that the relationship between mobility and belonging is to some extent a matter of territorial scale.
Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (Eds.). (1992). Place attachment. New York: Plenum.
2.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). London: Verso.
3.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity.
4.
Bell, M., & Ward, G. (2000). Comparing temporary mobility with permanent migration . Tourism Geographies, 2, 87-107.
5.
Boyle, P., Halfacree, K., & Robinson, V. (1998). Exploring contemporary migration. Harlow: Longman.
6.
Brown, G., Brown, B.B., & Perkins, D.D. (2004). New housing as neighborhood revitalization: Place attachment and confidence among residents. Environment and Behavior, 36, 749-775.
7.
Case, D. (1996). Contributions of journeys away to the definition of home: An empirical study of a dialectical process. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 1-15.
8.
Cass, N., Shove, E., & Urry, J. (2005). Social exclusion, mobility and access. The Sociological Review, 53, 539-555.
9.
Castles, S. (2002). Migration and community formation under conditions of globalization. International Migration Review, 36, 1143-1168.
10.
Castles, S., & Miller, M.J. (1998). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
11.
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern Western world . New York: Routledge.
12.
Duchesne, S., & Frognier, A.-P. (1995). Is there a European identity? In O. Niedermayer & R. Sinnott (Eds.), Public opinion and internationalized governance (pp. 193-226). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
Feldman, R.M. (1990). Settlement-identity: Psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society. Environment and Behavior , 22, 183-229.
15.
Fischer, P., & Malmberg, G. (2001). Settled people don't move: On life course and (im-)mobility in Sweden. International Journal of Population Geography, 7, 357-371.
16.
Fried, M. (2000). Continuities and discontinuities of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 193-205.
17.
Fuhrer, U., Kaiser, F.G., & Hartig, T. (1993). Place attachment and mobility during leisure time . Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 309-321.
18.
Goldthorpe, J.H. (1987). Social mobility and class structure in modern Britain (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.
19.
Gubert, R. (Ed.). (1999). Territorial belonging between ecology and culture. Trento, Italy: University of Trento, Department of Sociology and Social Research.
20.
Gustafson, P. (2001a). Roots and routes: Exploring the relationship between place attachment and mobility. Environment and Behavior , 33, 667-686.
21.
Gustafson, P. (2001b). Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 5-16.
22.
Gustafson, P. (2006). Work-related travel, gender and family obligations . Work, Employment and Society, 20, 513-530.
23.
Gustafson, P. (2007). More cosmopolitan, no less local: The orientations of international travellers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Swedish Sociological Association, Lund University, February 8-9, 2007.
24.
Hannerz, U. (1990). Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture. Theory, Culture and Society, 7(2/3), 237-251.
25.
Hay, R. (1998). Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 5-29.
26.
Kasarda, J.D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328-339.
27.
Kaufmann, V. (2002). Re-thinking mobility: Contemporary sociology. Aldershot: Ashgate. Kennedy, P. (2004). Making global society: Friendship networks among transnational professionals in the building design industry. Global Networks, 4, 157-179.
28.
Knez, I. (2005). Attachment and identity as related to a place and its perceived climate. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 25, 207-218.
29.
Kohli, M. (2000). The battlegrounds ofEuropean identity. European Societies, 2, 113-137.
30.
Laczko, L.S. (2005). National and local attachments in a changing world system: Evidence from an international survey. International Review of Sociology, 15, 517-528.
31.
Lasch, C. (1995). The revolt of the elites and the betrayal of democracy . New York: Norton.
32.
Lassen, C. (2006). Aeromobility and work. Environment and Planning A, 38, 301-312.
33.
Leed, E. (1991). The mind of the traveler: From Gilgamesh to global tourism. New York: Basic Books.
34.
Lewicka, M. (2005). Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 381-395.
35.
Micklethwait, J., & Wooldridge, A. (2000). A future perfect: The challenge and hidden promise of globalization. New York: Crown Business.
36.
Moser, G., Ratiu, E., & Fleury-Bahi, G. (2002). Appropriation and interpersonal relationships: From dwelling to city through the neighborhood. Environment and Behavior, 34, 122-136.
37.
Nagel, J. (1998). Masculinity and nationalism: Gender and sexuality in the making of nations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21, 242-269.
38.
Pollini, G. (2005). Elements of a theory of place attachment and socio-territorial belonging. International Review of Sociology, 15, 497-515.
39.
Proshansky, H.M., Fabian, A.K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
40.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
41.
Sager, T. (2006). Freedom as mobility: Implications of the distinction between actual and potential travelling. Mobilities, 1, 465-488.
42.
Savage, M., Bagnall, G., & Longhurst, B. (2005). Globalization and belonging. London: Sage.
43.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207-226.
44.
Statistics Sweden. (1982) Socioekonomisk indelning [Swedish socioeconomic classification] (Meddelanden i samordningsfrågor [Reports on statistical co-ordination] 1982:4). Stockholm: Author.
45.
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge .
46.
van der Land, M. (1998). Myths of mobility: On the geography of work and leisure among Rotterdam's new middle class. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 13, 117-135.
47.
Weibull, L. (2004). Svenskarnas syn på omvärlden [Swedish views of the world]. In S. Holmberg & L. Weibull (Eds.), Ju mer vi är tillsammans: Tjugusju kapitel om politik, medier och samhälle [The more we are together: Twenty-seven chapters on politics, media and society] (pp. 117-131). Göteborg: SOM-institutet, Göteborg University.
48.
Whitelegg, J. (1997). Critical mass: Transport, environment and society in the twenty-first century. London: Pluto.
