This article investigates the factors that influence the decision made by individuals to participate in home composting schemes promoted by two local authorities in Scotland. The research considers eight potential determinants of home composting behavior and applies logistic regression data analysis to assess the significance of these specific determinants. The results suggest that the most important variables for predicting whether individuals choose to participate in the home composting scheme include (a) having a favorable attitude toward what home composting involves, (b) being knowledgeable about home composting, (c) and the stage of the household in terms of the family life cycle. Variables such as general environmental concern, participation in other proenvironmental behaviors, social norms, social diffusion, and being a “gardener” were not significant predictors of the decision to participate. The implications of these findings for the promotion of home composting schemes are discussed.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-919.
Azjen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl & J. F. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behaviour (pp. 11-39). New York: Springer-Verlag.
4.
Azjen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
5.
Chubb, N. (1994). Regional Municipality of Peel 1993 backyard composter program and survey final report. Peel, Canada: Regional Municipality of Peel.
6.
Corral-Verdugo, V. (1996). A structural model of reuse and recycling in Mexico . Environment and Behavior, 28, 665-697.
7.
De Young, R. (1991). Some psychological aspects of living lightly: Desired lifestyle patterns and conservation behaviour. Journal of Environmental Systems, 20, 215-227.
8.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions Report. (1998). Home composting in England and Wales . London: Author.
9.
Derksen, L., & Gartrell, J. (1993) The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review, 58, 434-442.
10.
Dunlap, R.E., & Jones, R.E. (2003). Environmental attitudes and values. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 364-669). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Dunlap, R.E., & Van Liere, K.D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19.
12.
Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G., & Jones, R.E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
13.
Everett, J.W., & Pierce, J.J. (1992) Social networks, socio-economic status and environmental collective action: Residential curbside block leader recycling. Journal of Environmental systems, 21, 65-84.
14.
Field, A. (2003). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows . London: Sage.
15.
Gamba, R., & Oskamp, S. (1994). Factors influencing community residents' participation in commingled curbside recycling programs. Environment and Behavior, 26, 587-612.
16.
Granzin, K.L., & Olsen, J.E. (1991). Characterising participants in activities protecting the environment: A focus on donating, recycling and conservation behaviours . Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10, 1-27.
Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist. London: Sage.
20.
Lansana, F.M. (1992). Distinguishing potential recyclers from nonrecyclers: A basis for developing recycling strategies. Journal of Environmental Education, 23(2), 16-23.
21.
Lansana, F.M. (1993). A comparative analysis of curbside recycling behavior in urban and suburban communities. Professional Geographer , 45, 169-179.
22.
McCarty, J.A., & Shrum, L.J. (1994). The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior. Journal of Business Research, 30, 53-62.
23.
McKenzie-Mohr, D., Nemiroff, L.S., Beers, L., & Desmarais, S. (1995). Determinants of responsible environmental behaviour . Journal of Social Issues, 51, 139-156.
24.
Oskamp, S. (1995). Resource conservation and recycling: Behavior and policy. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 157-177.
25.
Schultz, P.W., & Oskamp, S. (1996). Effort as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship: General environmental concern and recycling. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 375-383.
26.
Schultz, P.W., Oskamp, S., & Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 105-121.
27.
Shrum, L.J., Lowrey, T.M., & McCarty, J.A. (1995). Applying social and traditional marketing principles to the reduction of household waste. American Behavioural Scientist, 38, 646-657.
28.
Spaccarelli, S., Zolik, E., & Jason, L.A. (1989). Effects of verbal prompting and block characteristics on participation in curbside newspaper recycling. Journal of Environmental Systems, 19(1), 45-57
29.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). An integrated model of waste management behavior: A test of household recycling and composting intentions. Environment and Behavior, 27, 603-630.
30.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1997). Understanding the determinants of consumer composting behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 602-628.
31.
Tucker, P., & Speirs, D. (2001) Understanding home composting behaviour. Paisley, Scotland: University of Paisley.
32.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989 ). The solid waste dilemma: An agenda for action. Washington, DC: Author.
33.
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behavior, 22, 55-73.
34.
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1580-1607.
