Creating “community” has long been a goal of urban planners. Although such rhetoric abounds in planning circles, what it all means is unclear. In this article, the authors review the community psychology and urban planning literature, defining sense of community within the context of how the built environment might facilitate or impede it. They then present their research, which tests the effects of “main street” on sense of community in four San Francisco neighborhoods. Results indicate that respondents in neighborhoods exhibiting characteristics of a main street town (Bernal Heights and West Portal) have significantly higher sense of community than do respondents from a high-density neighborhood (Nob Hill) and from a more suburban-style city neighborhood (Sunset).
Blash, L., Shafer, H., Nakagawa, M., & Jarrett, S. (2005). Getting behind the headlines: Families leaving San Francisco. San Francisco: San Francisco State University, Public Research Institute.
2.
Boston Main Streets. (2003). Boston Main Streets: Annual report, 2003. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.mainstreet.org/MediaLibrary/BostonMainStreetsAnnualRpt2003.pdf
3.
Brown, B.B., & Cropper, V.L. (2001). New urban and standard suburban subdivisions: Evaluating psychological and social goals. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(4), 402-419.
4.
Brown, B.B., & Werner, C.W. (1985). Social cohesiveness, territoriality, and holiday decorations: The influence of cul-de-sacs. Environment and Behavior, 17, 539-565.
5.
Buckner, J.C. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(6), 771-791.
6.
Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
7.
Campbell, K.E., & Lee, B.A. (1992). Sources of personal neighbor networks: Social integration, need, or time?Social Forces, 70(4), 1077-1100.
8.
Chipuer, H.M., & Pretty, G.M.H. (1999). A review of the Sense of Community Index: Current uses, factor structure, reliability, and further development. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 643-658.
9.
Cochrun, S.E. (1994). Understanding and enhancing neighborhood sense of community. Journal of Planning Literature, 9(1), 92-99.
Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1994). The neighborhood, the district, and the corridor. In P. Katz (Ed.), The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community (pp. xvii-xx). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Ewing, R., King, M.R., Raudenbush, S., & Clemente, O.J. (2005). Turning highways into main streets. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(3), 269-282.
13.
Farrell, S.J., Aubry, T., & Coulombe, D. (2004). Neighborhoods and neighbors: Do they contribute to personal well-being? Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 9-25.
14.
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in formal groups. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15.
Fowler, E.P. (1987). Street management and city design. Social Forces, 66(2), 365-389.
16.
Francaviglia, R.V. (1996). Main Street revisited: Time, space, and image building in small-town America. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
17.
Glynn, T.J. (1986). Neighborhood and sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(4), 341-352.
18.
Hill, J.L. (1996). Psychological sense of community: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 431-438.
19.
Hooker, M. (2004). Silver Spring tries harder. Planning , 70(2), 32-36.
20.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
21.
Katz, P. (1994). The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community . New York: McGraw Hill.
22.
Kim, J., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment and Behavior, 36(3), 313-340.
23.
Kunstler, J.H. (1993). The geography of nowhere. New York: Simon & Schuster.
24.
Kunstler, J.H. (1996). Home from nowhere. New York : Simon & Schuster.
25.
Lockwood, C. (1997). Putting the urb in the suburbs. Planning, 63(6), 18-21.
26.
Long, D.A., & Perkins, D.D. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sense of Community Index and development of a brief SCI. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(3), 279-296.
27.
Lund, H. (2003). Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4), 414-429.
28.
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
30.
Nasar, J.L. (2003). Does neotraditional development build community ? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23, 58-68.
31.
Nasar, J.L., & Julian, D.A. (1995). The psychological sense of community in the neighborhood . Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(2), 178-184.
32.
National Trust Main Street Center. (n.d.). Why are main streets important? Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://www.mainstreet.org/content.aspx?page=1927
33.
Netemeyer, R.G., Bearden, W.O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
35.
Obst, P.L., & White, K.M. (2004). Revisiting the Sense of Community Index: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(6), 691-705.
36.
Perkins, D.D., Florin, P., Rich, R.C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D.M. (1990). Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 83-115.
37.
Plas, J.M., & Lewis, S.E. (1996). Environmental factors and sense of community in a planned town. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(1), 109-143.
38.
Prezza, M., Amici, M., Roberti, T., & Tedeschi, G. (2001). Sense of community referred to the whole town: Its relations with neighboring, loneliness, life satisfaction, and area of residence. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), 29-52.
39.
Riger, S., & Lavrakas, P. (1981). Community ties, patterns of attachment, and social interaction in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 55-66.
40.
Robertson, K.A. (1999). Can small-city downtowns remain viable? A national study of development issues and strategies. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(3), 270-283.
41.
Robertson, K.A. (2004). The main street approach to downtown development: An examination of the four-point program. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 21(1), 55-73.
42.
San Francisco Planning Department. (n.d.-a). Eastern neighborhoods community planning, ch. 6.2: Mission. Retrieved August 4, 2005, from http://www.sfgov.org/site/planning_index.asp?id=25381
43.
San Francisco Planning Department. (n.d.-b). General plan: Area plan, south of Market. Retrieved August 4, 2005, from http://www.sfgov.org/site/planning_index.asp?id=24896
44.
Sarason, S.B. (1974). The psychological sense of community. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
45.
Solomon, D. (2003). Global city blues. Washington, DC: Island.
46.
Southworth, M. (2005). Reinventing main street: From mall to townscape mall. Journal of Urban Design, 10(2), 151-170.
47.
Talen, E. (1999). Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Studies , 36(8), 1361-1379.
48.
Talen, E. (2000). The problem with community in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(2), 171-183.
49.
Unger, D.G., & Wandersman, A. (1985). The importance of neighbors: The social, cognitive, and affective components of neighboring. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 139-169.
50.
Wolshon, B., & Wahl, J. (1999). Novi's main street: Neotraditional neighborhood planning and design. Journal of Urban Planning and Development , 125(1), 2-16.
