Results from 240 students (120 each from Brazil and Norway) on the 15-item revised New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) show higher endorsement of the ecological paradigm from the Brazilians; suggestions are that this relates to cultural variables rather than to technological development variables. There is no consistent relationship between scores on the NEP and scores from tests of justice based and care based morality, gender roles, or cultural orientation. Alphas, inter-item correlations, and factor analysis show much variation between the samples, but the relative ranking of items show very high agreement.
Bechtel, R. B., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Pinheiro, J. de Q. (1999). Environmental belief systems. United States, Brazil, and Mexico. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 30, 122-128.
2.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
3.
Biaggio, A., Vikan, A., & Camino, C. (2005). Orientacao social, papel sexual, e julgamento moral: Um comparacao de dois amostras Brasileiras e uma Norueguesa [Sexual orientation, sexual role, and moral judgment: A comparison of two Brazilian and one Norwegian sample]. Revista de Psicologia: Reflecao & Critica, 18, 1-6.
4.
Corral-Verdugo, V., & Armendariz, L. I. (2000). The “New Environmental Paradigm” in a Mexican community. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 25-31.
5.
Dunlap, R. E., & VanLiere, K. D. (1978). The “New Environmental Paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
6.
Dunlap, R. E., Gallup, G., & Gallup, A. (1993). Of global concern: Results of a health of the planet survey. Environment, 35(9), 7-39.
7.
Dunlap, R. E., VanLiere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
8.
Furman, A. (1998). A note on environmental concern in a developing country. Environment and Behavior, 30, 520-534.
9.
Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., & Fuller, D. (1992). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of sosiomoral reflection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Gooch, G. D. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic states. Environment and Behavior, 27, 513-539.
12.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the minds. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Howe, D. C., Kahn, P. E., Jr., & Friedman, B. (1996). Along the Rio Negro: Brazilian children’s environmental views and values. Developmental Psychology, 32, 979-987.
14.
Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Friedman, B. (1995). Environmental views and values of children in an inner-city Black community. Child Development, 66, 1403-1417.
15.
Leung, C., & Rice, J. (2002). Comparison of Chinese-Australian and Anglo-Australian environmental attitudes and behaviour. Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 251-262.
16.
Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Environmental risk concern and preference for energy saving measures. Environment and Behavior, 34, 455-478.
17.
Rauwald, K. S., & Moore, C. E. (2002). Environmental attitudes as predictors of policy support across three cultures. Environment and behaviour, 34, 709-739.
18.
Schultz, P. W., Unipan, J. B., & Gamba, R. J. (2000). Acculturation and ecological worldview among Latino Americans. The Journal of Environmental Education, 2000(31), 22-27.
19.
Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1998). Values and proenvironmental behaviour. A five country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540-558.
20.
Schultz, P. W., Zelezny, L., & Dalrymple, N. J. (2000). A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 32, 576-591.
21.
Skoe, E. E., & Diessner, R. (1994). Ethic of care, justice, identity, and gender: An extension and replication. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40, 272-289.
22.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in a social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723-743.
23.
Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407-415.
24.
Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907-924.
25.
Van de Vijver, F. D. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Van Herk, H., Poortinga, Y. H., & Verhallen, T. M. M. (2004). Response styles in rating scales. Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 346-360.
27.
Widegren, O. (1998). The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environment and Behavior, 30, 75-100.
