This study examines the quality of life in Crete, Nebraska, with the specific purpose of identifying the factors that play the largest role in determining residential satisfaction. The survey asks a number of questions pertaining to different aspects of living in Crete. The survey is adapted from a survey previously used for a similar study in Schuyler, Nebraska. Focus groups are used to identify key issues in Crete and make adjustments to the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha is used to test the reliability of the topical variables, and index variables are created, which are used in the subsequent analysis. Using residential satisfaction as the dependent variable, stepwise multiple linear regressions are performed independently for the total population, the new arrivals, and the long-time resident groups. The findings of this study indicate that stressors and sociocultural issues are the significant contributors to the overall community's residential satisfaction.
Amerigo, M. (1990). The perception of residential environment and environment role. In H. Pamir, V. Iuramoglu, & N. Teymur (Eds.), Culture, space and history (Vol. 5, pp. 337-342). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Architecture.
2.
Amerigo, M., & Aragones, J. (1990). Residential satisfaction in council housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 313-325.
3.
Anderson, J., & Weidemann, S. (1997). Developing and utilizing models of resident satisfaction. In G. Moore & R. Marans (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design (Vol. 4, pp. 287-314). New York: Plenum.
4.
Basolo, V., & Strong, D. (2002). Understanding the neighborhood: From residents' perceptions and needs to action. Housing Policy Debate, 13, 83-105.
5.
Borjas, G. J. (2002).Homeownershipin the immigrantpopulation. Journal of UrbanEconomics, 52, 448-476.
6.
Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of American life: Perception, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.
7.
Canter, D. (1983). The purposive evaluation of places: A facet approach. Environment and Behavior, 15(6), 659-699.
8.
Cantu, L. (1995). The peripherialization of rural America: A case study of Latino migrants in America's heartland. Sociological Perspectives, 38, 399-414.
9.
Cherniss, C. (2002).Emotionalintelligenceand the goodcommunity. AmericanJournalof Community Psychology, 30, 1-11.
10.
Cutter, S. (1982). Residential satisfaction and the suburban homeowner. Urban Geography, 3, 315-327.
11.
Davies, V. (1945). Development of a scale to rate attitudes of community satisfaction. Rural Sociology, 10, 246-255.
12.
Deshmukh, J. (1995).Housingsatisfaction: A cross-culturalstudy of marriedstudent housing.In J. Nasar, P. Grannis, & K. Hanyu (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual Environmental Design Research Association conference (p. 169-169). Boston, MA: Environmental Design Research Association.
13.
Elder, G. H., Jr. (Ed.). (1985). Life course dynamics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
Filkins, R., Allen, J. C., & Cordes, S. (2000).Predicting communitysatisfaction amongrural residents: An integrative model. Rural Sociology, 65, 72-86.
15.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior:An introductionto theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Francescato, G., Weidemann, S., & Anderson, J. R. (1986, July). Residential satisfaction and residential quality: An overview of recent applications. Paper presented at the 21st International Congress of Applied Psychology, Jerusalem, Israel.
17.
Francescato, G., Weidemann, S., & Anderson, J. R. (1987). Residential satisfaction: Its uses and limitations in housing. In W. van Vliet, H. Choldin, W. Michelson, & D. Popenoe (Eds.), Housing and neighborhoods: Theoretical and empirical contributions (pp. 43-57). New York: Greenwood.
18.
Francescato, G., Weidemann, S., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). Evaluating the built environment from the users' point of view: An attitudinal model of residential satisfaction. In W. Preiser (Ed.), Building evaluation (pp. 181-198). New York: Plenum.
19.
Galster, G., & Hesser, G. (1981). Residential satisfaction. Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13, 735-758.
20.
Goudy, W. J. (1977). Evaluations of local attributes and community satisfaction in small towns. Rural Sociology, 42, 371-382.
21.
Grey, M., & Woodrick, A. (2002). Unofficial sister cities: Meatpacking labor migration between Villachuato, Mexico, and Marshalltown, Iowa. Human Organization, 61, 364-376.
22.
Guest, A. M., & Lee, B. A. (1983). Sentiment and evaluation as ecological variables. Sociological Perspectives, 26, 159-184.
23.
Guney, Y. (1997, May). The evaluation of high-rise residents' satisfaction in Turkey. Paper presented at the Environmental Design and Research Association 28th Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
24.
Hagerty, M. (1999). Testing Maslow's hierarchy of needs: National quality-of-life across time. Social Indicators Research, 46, 249-271.
25.
Howarth, C. S. (2001).Towards a social psychologyof community:A social representations perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 223-238.
26.
Kim, S. (1997, May). Outdoor environment satisfaction: Contributions of landscape design to multi-family housing residents' satisfaction. Paper presented at the Environmental Design and Research Association 28th Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
27.
Marans, R., & Rodgers, S. (1975). Toward an understanding of community satisfaction. In A. Hawley & V. Rock (Eds.), Metropolitan America in contemporary perspective.New York: Halsted.
28.
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation & personality. New York: Harper & Row.
29.
McHugh, K. E., Hogan, T. D., & Happel, S. K. (1995).Multipleresidenceandcyclical migration: A life course perspective. Professional Geographer, 47(3), 251-267.
30.
Morris, E. W., & Winter, M. (1975).A theory of family housing adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 79-88.
31.
Morris, E. W., & Winter, M. (1978). Housing, family, and society. New York: John Wiley.
32.
Newman, S., & Duncan, G. (1979). Residential problems, dissatisfactions and mobility. Journal of American Planning Association, 45, 106-112.
33.
O'Donnell, J., Ferreira, J., Hurtado, R., Ames, E., Floyd, R., & Sebren, L. (1998). Partners for change: Community residents and agencies. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 25, 133-151.
34.
Painter, G., Gabriel, S., & Myers, D. (2001). Race, immigrant status, and housing tenure choice. Journal of Urban Economics, 49, 150-167.
35.
Premius, H. (1986). Housing as a social adaptation process: A conceptual scheme. Environment and Behavior, 18, 31-52.
36.
Pruitt, L. (1978). The influence of residential domain satisfaction and life domain satisfactions on overall satisfaction with quality of life. In W. Rogers & W. Ittelson (Eds.), New directions in environmental design research, proceedings of the ninth annual Environmental Design Research Association Conference (pp. 226-238). Tucson, AZ: Environmental Design Research Association.
37.
Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
38.
Rohe, W., & Basolo, V. (1997).Long-termeffects of homeownershipon the self-perceptionsand social interaction of low-income persons. Environment and Behavior, 29(6), 793-819.
39.
Rojek, D. A., Clemente, F. R., & Summers, G. A. (1975). Community satisfaction: A study of contentment with local services. Rural Sociology, 40(2), 177-192.
40.
Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move. Glenco, IL: Free Press.
41.
Sirgy, M. (1986). A quality-of-life theory derived from Maslow's developmental perspective:“Quality” is related to progressive satisfaction of a hierarchy of needs, lower order and higher. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 45, 329-341.
42.
Smith, M., & Krannich, R. (2000). “Culture clash” revisited: Newcomer and longer-term residents' attitudes toward land use, development, and environmental issues in rural communities in the Rocky Mountain West. Rural Sociology, 65, 396-421.
43.
Speare, A. (1974). Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography, 11, 173-188.
44.
Taylor, P. (1993). Geographical scales of residential satisfaction for older adults: A comparison of dwelling and neighborhood satisfaction. In R. Feldman, G. Hardie, & D. Saile (Eds.), Power by design, proceedings of the 24th Annual Environmental Design Research Association Conference (pp. 114-118). Chicago: Environmental Design Research Association.
45.
Taylor, P. (1995). Social and environmental contexts of aging in place. In J. Nasar, P. Grannis, & K. Hanyu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Environmental Design Research AssociationConference (pp.107-112).Boston, MA: EnvironmentalDesignResearch Association.
46.
Theodori, G. (2001). Examining the effects of community satisfaction and attachment on individual well-being. Rural Sociology, 66, 618-628.
47.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1990). 1990summary tape file 1. Retrieved December 7, 2002, from http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en
48.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Hispanic or Latino, and not Hispanic or Latino by race, Census 2000 summary file 1. Retrieved December 7, 2002, from http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en
49.
U.S. Census Bureau, Difference in Diversity. (various years, 1990 to 2000). Hispanic or Latino origin and all races. Mapping Census 2000: The geography of U.S. diversity. Retrieved December7, 2002, from http://www.census.gov/population/cen2000/atlas/censr01-104.pdf
50.
U.S. Census Bureau, Percent Change. (various years, 1990 to 2000). Hispanic or Latino origin all races. Mapping Census 2000: The geography of U.S. diversity. Retrieved December 7, 2002, from http://www.census.gov/population/cen2000/atlas/censr01-111.pdf
51.
Wasserman, I. M. (1982).Size of place in relationto communityattachmentand satisfaction with community services. Social Indicators Research, 11, 421-436.
52.
Weidemann, S., & Anderson, J. (1982).Residents'perceptions of satisfaction and safety: A basis for change in multifamily housing. Environment and Behavior, 14(6), 695-724.
53.
Weidemann, S., & Anderson, J. (1985). A conceptual framework for residential satisfaction. In I. Altman & C. Werner (Eds.), Home environments (pp. 153-182). New York: Plenum.
54.
Wolff, T. (2001). Community coalition building—Contemporary practice and research: Introduction. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 165-172.
