The effects of support for free-market ideology and environmental apathy were investigated to identify some bases for not believing in global climate change. A survey of community residents' (N= 185) beliefs about global climate change also assessed ecocentrism, anthropocentrism, perceived knowledge about climate change, and self-efficacy. The beliefs that global climate change is not occurring, is mainly not human caused, will also have positive consequences and that weaker intentions to undertake ameliorative actions were significantly associated with greater support for free-market ideology, greater environmental apathy, less ecocentrism, and less self-efficacy. About 40% of the variance in each belief and 56% of the variance in the behavioral intention was explained by these factors. The results suggest that the relation between support for free-market ideology and the beliefs about global climate change is mediated by environmental apathy.
Axelrod, L. J., & Suedfeld, P. (1995) Technology, capitalism, and Christianity: Are they really the three horsemen of the eco-collapse?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 183-195.
2.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
3.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in humanagency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
4.
Bandura, A. (1986). From thought to action: Mechanisms of personal agency. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 15, 1-17.
5.
Baron, R. M.,& Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6.
Bjerke, T., & Kaltenborn, B. P. (1999). The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 415-421.
7.
Bostrom, A., Morgan, G., Fischhoff, B., & Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14, 959-970.
8.
Dunlap, R. E. (1998). Lay perceptions of global risk: Public views of global warming in crossnational context. International Sociology, 13, 473-498.
9.
Dunlap, R. E.,& Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The newenvironmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
10.
Geller, E. S. (1995). Integrating behaviorism and humanism for environmental protection. Journal of Social Issues, 51(4), 179-195.
11.
Gladwin, T. N., Newburry, W. E.,& Reiskin, E. D. (1997). Why is the northern elite mind biased against community, the environment, and a sustainable future? In M. H. Bazerman & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior(pp. 234-274). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
12.
Golding, D., Krimsky, S., & Plough, A. (1992). Evaluating risk communication: Narrative vs. technical presentation of information about radon. Risk Analysis, 12, 27-35.
13.
Homer, P. M.,& Kahle, L. R. (1988). Astructural equation test of value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638-646.
14.
Kaplan, S. (2000). Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 491-508.
15.
Kerr, N. L. (1992). Efficacy as a causal and moderating variable in social dilemmas. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & A. M. Henk (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings(pp. 59-80). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
16.
Kuhn, K. M. (2000). Message format and audience values: Interactive effects of uncertainty information and environmental attitudes on perceived risk. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 41-51.
17.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
18.
National Research Council. (1999). Global environmental change: Research pathways for the next decade. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19.
O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19, 461-471.
20.
O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., Yarnal, B., & Wiefek, N. (2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 1-17.
21.
Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, G., Fischhoff, B., & Smuts, T. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 2. Survey studies of educated lay people. Risk Analysis, 14, 971-982.
22.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). Industrial/environmental crises and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Socio-Economics, 24, 211-227.
23.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Strachan and Cadell.
24.
Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65-84.
25.
Takala, M. (1991). Environmental awareness and human activity. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 585-597.
26.
Thompson, S. C. G., & Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 149-157.
27.
Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., Williams, D. R., & Joker, S. (2001). Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 761-776.
28.
Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Hoffman, A. J., Thompson, L. L., Moore, D. A., Gillespie, J. J., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002). Barriers to resolution in ideologically based negotiations: The role of values and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 27, 41-57.
29.
Weber, E. U. (1999). Perception and expectation of climate change. In M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel, & K. A. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation(pp. 315-341). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
