This study investigated the effects of performing animal-training sessions with Asian small-clawed otters (Aonyx cinerea) while zoo visitors watched. The effects of having an interpreter present to describe the otters and their training on zoo visitors were also assessed. The data from 389 visitors to Zoo Atlanta’s otter exhibit were analyzed, and exhibit stay times and animal activity levels were recorded during four conditions (passive exhibit viewing, interpretation-only sessions, public animal- training sessions, and public animal training with interpretation sessions). The findings suggest that public animal training and public animal training with interpretation produce more positive zoo experiences, training perceptions, exhibit size and staff assessments, and longer visitor exhibit stay times when compared to passive exhibit viewing and interpretation-only sessions. This study quantifies an outcome of positive reinforcement training beyond its effects on animals and extends the benefits to zoo visitors by providing information on how to increase positive perceptions and experiences for zoological park visitors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altman, J. D. (1998). Animal activity and visitor learning at the zoo. Anthrozoos, 11(1), 12-21.
2.
Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 48, 227-265.
3.
Ben-Ari, E. T. (2000). Speaking for nature. BioScience, 50, 556-562.
4.
Bitgood, S., Patterson, D., & Benefield, A. (1986). Understanding your visitors: Ten factors that influence visitor behavior. InAmerican Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums 1986 Annual Conference Proceedings (pp.726-743). Minneapolis, MN: American Associa tion of Zoological Parks & Aquariums.
5.
Bitgood, S., Patterson, D., & Benefield, A. (1988). Exhibit design and visitor behavior: Empirical relationships. Environment and Behavior, 20(4), 474-491.
6.
Bloomsmith, M. A., Stone, A. M., & Laule, G. E. (1998). Positive reinforcement training to enhance the voluntary movements of group-housed chimpanzees within their enclosures. Zoo Biology, 17(4), 333-341.
7.
Broad, G. (1996). Visitor profile and evaluation of informal education at Jersey Zoo.Dodo Journal of the Wildlife Preservation Trusts, 32, 166-192.
8.
Crockett, C. (1996). Data collection in the zoo setting, emphasizing behavior. In D. G. Kleiman, M. E. Allen, K. V. Thompson, & S. Lumpkin (Eds.),Wild Mammals in Captivity (pp. 545-565). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
9.
Desmond, T., & Laule, G. (1994). Use of positive reinforcement training in the management of species for reproduction. Zoo Biology, 13(5), 471-477.
10.
Field, D., & Wagar, J. (1973). Visitor groups and interpretation in parks and other outdoor leisure settings. Journal of Environmental Education, 5(1), 12-17.
11.
Finlay, T., James, L. R., & Maple, T. L. (1988).People’s perceptions of animals: The influence of zoo environment. Environment and Behavior, 20(4), 508-528.
12.
Heinrich, C. J., & Birney, B. A. (1992). Effects of live animal demonstrations on zoo visitors’ retention of information. Anthrozoos, 5(2), 113-121.
13.
Hoff, M. P., & Maple, T. L. (1982). Sex and age differences in the avoidance of reptile exhibits by zoo visitors. Zoo Biology, 1, 263-269.
14.
Jackson, D. M. (1994). Animal activity and presence of docent interaction: Visitor behavior at Zoo Atlanta. Visitor Behavior, 9(1), 16.
15.
Johnston, R. J. (1998). Exogenous factors and visitor behavior: A regression analysis of exhibit viewing time. Environment and Behavior, 30(3), 322-347.
16.
Kidd, A. H., & Kidd, R. M. (1997). Aquarium visitors’ perceptions and attitudes toward the importance of marine biodiversity. Psychological Reports, 81, 1083-1088.
17.
Knapp, D., Volk, T. L., & Hungerford, H. R. (1997). The identification of empirically driven goals for program development in environmental interpretation. Environmental Education, 28(3), 24-34.
18.
Kreger, M. D., & Mench, J. A. (1995). Visitor-animal interactions at the zoo. Anthrozoos, 8(3), 143-158.
19.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 55.
20.
Martin, S. (1996). Training as enrichment. In American Zoo and Aquarium Association 1996 Regional Conference Proceedings (pp. 139-143). Minneapolis, MN: American Zoo & Aquarium Association.
21.
Morgan, J. M., Absher, J., Loudon, B., & Sutherland, D. (1997). The relative effectiveness of interpretive programs directed by youth and adult naturalists in a national forest. Journal of Interpretation Research, 2(1), 12-26.
22.
Morgan, J. M., & Hodgkinson, M. (1999). The motivation and social orientation of visitors attending a contemporary zoological park. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 227-239.
23.
Nielson, C., & Buchanan, T. (1986). A comparison of the effectiveness of two interpretive pro- grams regarding fire ecology and fire management. Journal of Interpretation, 11(1), 1-10.
24.
Oliver, S. S., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1985). Education to reduce impacts in forest campgrounds. Journal of Forestry, 83(4), 234-236.
25.
Olson, E. C., Bowman, M. L., & Roth, R. E. (1984). Interpretation and nonformal education in natural resources management. Journal of Environmental Education, 15, 6-10.
26.
Phillpot, P. (1996). Visitor viewing behaviour in the Gaherty Reptile Breeding Centre, Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust: A preliminary study. Dodo Journal of the Wildlife Preservation Trusts, 32, 193-202.
27.
Prentice, R. (1991). Measuring the educational effectiveness of on-site interpretation designed for tourists: an assessment of student recall from geographical field visits to Kidwelly Castle, Dyfed. Area, 23(4), 297-308.
28.
Reade, L. S., & Waran, N. K. (1996). The modern zoo: How do people perceive zoo animals? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 7(1-2), 109-118.
29.
Rencher, A. C. (1995). Methods of multivariate analysis: Basic applications. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
30.
Roggenbuck, J. W., & Berrier, D. L. (1982). A comparison of the effectiveness of two communication strategies in dispersing wilderness campers. Journal of Leisure Research, 14, 77-89.
31.
Roggenbuck, J. W., Loomis, R. J., & Dagostino, J. (1990). The learning benefits of leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 112-124.
32.
Shettel-Neuber, J. (1988). Second- and third-generation zoo exhibits: A comparison of visitor, staff, and animal responses. Environment and Behavior, 20(4), 452-473.
33.
Stoinski, T. S., Ogden, J. J., Gold, K. C., & Maple, T. L. (2001). Captive apes and zoo education. In B. B. Beck, T. S. Stoinski, M. Hutchins, T. L. Maple, B. Norton, A. Rowan, E. F. Stevens, & A. Arluke (Eds.), Great Apes and Humans: The ethics of coexistence (pp.113-132).Washing- ton, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
34.
Swanagan, J. S. (1993). An assessment of factors influencing zoo visitors’conservation attitudes and behavior. Unpublished master’s thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
35.
Swanagan, J. S. (2000). Factors influencing zoo visitors’ conservation attitudes and behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 26-31.
36.
Tilden, F. (1957). Interpreting our heritage. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
37.
Vander Stoep, G. A., & Gramann, J. H. (1988). Use of interpretation as an indirect visitor management tool: An alternative to regulation and enforcement. In M. Legg (Ed.), National Association of Interpretation 1988 Research Monograph (pp. 47-55). Fort Collins, CO: National Association of Interpretation.
38.
Wolf, R. L., & Tymitz, B. L. (1980). Studying visitor perceptions of zoo environments: A naturalistic view. Zoo Display and Information Techniques, 21, 49-53.
39.
Yerke, R., & Burns, A. (1991). Measuring the impact of animal shows on visitor attitudes. In American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums 1991 Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 532-539). San Diego, CA: American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums.
