A study was conducted to further validate the Motivation Toward the Environment Scale (MTES). Results confirmed both the convergent and discriminant validity of the MTES by showing that peer reports corresponded to self-reports of environmental self-regulation and that environmental self-regulation was relatively distinct from self-regulation in academic and political domains. Results also pointed to some possible sources of autonomous self-regulation. Individuals were more likely to engage in autonomous environmental behaviors if (a) their parents had shown an interest in their developing attitudes about the environment, (b) their peers supported their freedom to make decisions about the environment, and (c) they had already developed life aspirations such as concern for their community. Finally, results confirmed the adaptive value of developing an autonomous regulatory style toward environmental activities. Thus, autonomous individuals were shown to report stable proenvironmental attitudes over time, a greater number of environmental behaviors, and higher levels of well-being.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
2.
Blais, M. R., Sabourin, S., Boucher, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (1990). Toward a motivational model of couple happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1021-1031.
3.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to the self: Integration in personality. In R. A. Dinothier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
4.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
5.
Finger, M. (1994). From knowledge to action? Exploring the relationships between environmental experiences, learning, and behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 141-160.
6.
Green-Demers, I., Pelletier, L. G., & Menard, S. (1997). The impact of behavioral difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviors. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 29, 157-166.
7.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890-898.
8.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children's self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143-154.
9.
Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458-489.
10.
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410-422.
11.
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280-287.
12.
Koestner, R., Fichman, L., & Losier, G. F. (2001). Internalization and adaptation: Finding personal meaning in school activities. Unpublished manuscript, McGill University.
13.
Koestner, R., Houlfort, N., Paquet, S., & Knight, C. (in press). On the risks of recycling because of guilt: An examination of the consequences of introjection. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
14.
Koestner, R., Losier, G. F., Vallerand, R. J., & Carducci, D. (1996). Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1025-1036.
15.
Losier, G. F., Perreault, S., Koestner, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2001). Examining individual differences in the internalization of political values: Validation of the self-determination scale of political motivation (SDSPM). Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 41-61.
16.
Maloney, M. P., & Ward, M. P. (1973). Ecology: Let's hear from the people: An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 28, 583-586.
17.
O'Connor, B. P., & Vallerand, R. J. (1989). Religious motivation in the elderly: a French-Canadian replication and an extension. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 53-59.
18.
Oskamp, S. (2000). A sustainable future for humanity? How can psychology help? American Psychologist, 55, 496-508.
19.
Pelletier, L. G. (2002). A motivational analysis of self-determination for pro-environmental behaviors. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 205-232). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
20.
Pelletier, L. G., & Bellier, P. (1999). How difficult is it to recycle? Self-determination and the level of difficulty of recycling behaviors. Manuscript in preparation, University of Ottawa.
21.
Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., Green-Demers, I., Noels, K., & Beaton, A. M. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment?: The Motivation Toward the Environment Scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 437-468.
22.
Rosenthal, R. & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A single general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166-169.
23.
Ryan. R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397-427.
24.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.
25.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
26.
Seguin, S., Pelletier, L. G., & Hunsley, J. (1999). Predicting environmental behaviors: The influences of self-determined motivation and information about perceived health risks. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1582-1604.
27.
Seligman, C. (1985). Information and energy conservation. Marriage and Family Review, 9, 135-149.
28.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271-360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29.
Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599-620.
30.
Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a reallife setting: Toward a motivation model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.
31.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C. B., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Education and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003-1019.
32.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C. B., & Vallieres, E. F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the Academic Motivation Scale. Education and Psychological Measurement, 53, 159-172.
33.
Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 37-63). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
34.
Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
35.
Winter, D. D. (2000). Some big ideas for some big problems. American Psychologist, 55, 516-522.
