The relation between different levels of public concern about the environment and sociodemographic and behavioral variables are main issues in several recent investigations. Many of these are based on the idea that environmental interest is shaped by personal beliefs. However, the internal structure of those beliefs is not well understood. In this investigation, 3 studies (N = 96; N = 397; N = 400) explored what different types of beliefs concerning people/environment relationships exist and how they are internally organized. Multidimensional techniques such as INDSCAL and facet theory were used to analyze the similarity structure of items asking for beliefs toward the environment. Three viewpoints were identified: ecocentric, anthropocentric, and beliefs based on an interest in material progress. Most participants reported an ecocentric belief. Results concerning the structural analyses are compatible with a strong relation between the anthropocentric and material progress approaches and with the assumption of independence of all 3 beliefs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adeola, F. O. (1996). Environmental contamination, public hygiene and human health concern in the third world: The case of Nigerian environmentalism. Environment and Behavior, 28, 614-646.
2.
Albrecht, D. E. , Bultena, G., Holberg, E., & Nowak, P. (1982). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale. Journal of Environmental Education, 13, 39-42.
3.
Altman, I. , & Chemers, M. (1980). Culture and environment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Amérigo, M. , González, A., & Aragonés, J. I. (1995). Antropocentrismo versus Ecocentrismo en una muestra de estudiantes [Anthropocentrism versus Ecocentrism in a students’ sample]. In E. Garrido & C. Herrero (Eds.), Psicología política, jurídica y ambiental [Political, legal and environmental psychology] (pp. 337-344). Salamanca, Spain: Eudema.
5.
Arcury, T. , & Christianson, E. H. (1990). Environmental worldview in response to environmental problems. Environment and Behavior, 22, 387-407.
6.
Ariansen, P. (1998). Anthropocentrism with a human face. Ecological Economics, 24, 153-162.
7.
Bechtel, R. B. , Corral, V., & Pinheiro, J. Q. (1999). Environmental belief systems: United States, Brazil and Mexico. Journal of Crosscultural Psychology, 30, 122-128.
8.
Berberoglu, G. , & Tosunoglu, C. (1995). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of an environmental attitude scale (EAS) for Turkish university students. Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 40-43.
9.
Borg, I. , & Shye, S. (1995). Facet theory: Form and content. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Canter, D. (1983a). The potential of facet theory for applied social psychology. Quality and Quantity, 17, 35-67.
11.
Canter, D. (1983b). The purposive of places: A facet approach. Environment & Behavior, 15, 35-67.
12.
Canter, D. (1995). The facets of place. In G. T. Moore & R. W. Marans (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior and design: Vol. 4. The integration of theory, research, methods, utilization (pp. 109-147). New York: Plenum.
13.
Carroll, J. D. , & Chang, J. J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrica, 35, 283-319.
14.
Corral, V. , & Armendáriz, L. I. (in press). The “New Environmental Paradigm” in a Mexican Community. Journal of Environmental Education.
15.
Corral, V. , Bechtel, R. B., Armendáriz, L. I., & Esquer, A. B. (1997). La estructura de las creencias ambientales en universitarios mexicanos: El Nuevo Paradigma Ambiental [The structure of the environmental beliefs in undergraduate Mexican students: The New Environmental Paradigm]. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 14(2), 173-181
16.
Correa, A. D. , Díaz, J., Suárez, E., & Hernández, B. (1993). Multidimensional scaling reliability in similarity judgments about environmental sentences. Quality and Quantity, 27, 201-209.
17.
Donald, I. (1995). Facet theory: defining research domains. In G. M. Breackwell, S. Hammond & C. Fife-Schaw (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (pp. 117-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Dunlap, R. E. , & Merting, A. G. (1995). Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite?Journal of Social Issues, 51, 121-137.
19.
Dunlap, R. E. , & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The New Environmental Paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
20.
Dunlap, R. E. , & Van Liere, K. D. (1984). Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013-1028.
21.
Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmental and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach. London: University College London.
22.
Eckersley, R. (1998). Beyond human racism. Environmental Values, 7, 165-182.
23.
Furman, A. (1998). A note on environmental concern in a developing country: Results from an Istanbul survey. Environment & Behavior, 30, 520-534.
24.
Gooch, G. F. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic States. Environment & Behavior, 27, 513-539.
25.
Grendstad, G. , & Wollebaek, D. (1998). Greener still? An empirical examination of Eckersley’s ecocentric approach. Environment & Behavior, 30, 653-675.
26.
Milbrath, L. (1986). Environmental beliefs and values. In M. Herman (Ed.), Handbook of political behavior (pp. 98-137). New York: Plenum.
27.
Noe, F. P. , & Snow, R. (1990). The New Environmental Paradigm and further scale analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 20-26.
28.
Oseland, N. , & Donald, I. (1993). The evaluation of space in homes: A facet study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 251-261.
29.
Shye, S. (1998). Modern facet theory: Content design and measurement in behavioral research. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 160-171.
30.
SPSS, Inc. (1997). SPSS for Windows (Version 7.5) [Computer software]. Chicago: Author.
31.
Stern, P. C. , Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientation, gender and environmental concern. Environment & Behavior, 25, 322-348.
32.
Suárez, E. , Hess, S., & Camacho, J. (1998). Estudio de la fiabilidad de juicios de similitud a través del MINISSA [Study of the reliability of judgments of similarity through the MINISSA]. In J. M. Sabucedo, R. García-Mira, E. Ares, & D. Prada (Eds.), Medio ambiente y responsabilidad humana: Aspectos sociales y ecológicos [Environment and human responsibility: Social and ecological aspects] (pp. 387-394). Coruña, Spain: Universidad Da Coruña.
33.
Thompson, S. , & Barton, M. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitude toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 137-157.
34.
Vogel, S. (1996). Farmer’s environmental attitudes and behavior. Environment & Behavior, 28, 591-613.
35.
Wilson, M. A. (1996). The socialization of architectural preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 33-44.
