The 18-item Need for Cognition (NFC) Scale (short version) was administered to two samples of 510 and 697 Australian males and females. Consistent with the findings of other researchers, a principal components analysis and confirmatory factor analysis indicated one dominant factor. The scores for 17 of the items were also shown to have internal consistency. The findings indicate that the short NFC Scale is applicable for use with Australian samples.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
2.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
3.
Cacioppo, J. T. , Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W.B.G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
4.
Cacioppo, J. T. , Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
5.
Cohen, J. T. , Scotland, E., & Wolfe, D. M. (1955). An experimental investigation of need for cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 291-294.
6.
Hair, J. F. , Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Sydney, Australia: Prentice Hall.
7.
Hunt, J. M. , Chatterjee, A., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Deliberate vs. disingenuous subjects on the social desirability of the need for cognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 95-98.
8.
Jöreskog, K. G. , & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 8: A guide to program and applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
9.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
10.
Marsh, H. W. (1986). The bias of negatively worded items in rating scales for young children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37-49.
11.
Marsh, H. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335-361.
12.
Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self-description questionnaire III: Manual. Macarthur, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
13.
Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810-819.
14.
Marsh, H. W. , & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 177-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Pedhazur, E. J. , & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Perri, M. , III, & Wolfgang, A. P. (1988). A modified measure of need for cognition. Psychological Reports, 62, 955-957.
18.
Sadowski, C. J. (1993). An examination of the short need for cognition scale. Journal of Psychology, 127, 451-454.
19.
Sadowski, C. J. , & Gulgoz, S. (1992). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the need for cognition scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 610-610.
20.
Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Tanaka, J. S. , Panter, A .T., & Winborne, W. C. (1988). Dimensions of the need for cognition: Subscales and gender differences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 35-50.
22.
Tepper, B. J. , & Tepper, K. (1993). The effects of method variance within measures. Journal of Psychology, 127, 293-302.
23.
Waters, L. K. , & Zakrajsek, T. (1990). Correlates of need for cognition total subscale scores. Education and Psychology Measurement, 50, 213-217.
