This article highlights the theoretical differences between the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement and demonstrates how such differences can lead to discrepant attitude estimates for individuals with the most extreme opinions. Both simulated data and real data on attitude toward abortion are used to demonstrate this discrepancy. The results suggest that attitude researchers should, at the very least, devote more attention to the empirical response characteristics of items on a Likert attitude questionnaire. At most, these results suggest that other methods, such as the Thurstone technique or one of its recently developed item response theory counterparts, should be used to derive attitude estimates from disagree-agree responses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrich, D. (1988). The application of an unfolding model of the PIRT type to the measurement of attitude. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 33-51.
2.
Andrich, D. (1996). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding polytomous responses: Reconciling Thurstone and Likert methodologies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 347-365.
3.
Andrich, D. , & Luo, G. (1993). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single-stimulus responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 253-276.
4.
Barclay, J. E. , & Weaver, H. B. (1962). Comparative reliabilities and the ease of construction of Thurstone and Likert attitude scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 109-120.
5.
Cliff, N. , Collins, L. M., Zatkin, J., Gallipeau, D., & McCormick, D. J. (1988). An ordinal scaling method for questionnaire and other ordinal data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 83-97.
6.
Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.
7.
DeSarbo, W. S. , & Hoffman, D. L. (1986). Simple and weighted unfolding threshold models for the spatial representation of binary choice data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 247-264.
8.
DeSarbo, W. S. , & Hoffman, D. L. (1987). Constructing MDS joint spaces from binary choice data: A multidimensional unfolding threshold model for marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 40-54.
9.
Edwards, A. L. , & Kenney, K. C. (1946). A comparison of the Thurstone and Likert techniques of attitude scale construction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 72-83.
10.
Ferguson, L. W. (1941). A study of the Likert technique of attitude scale construction. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 51-57.
11.
Flamer, S. (1983). Assessment of the multitrait-multimethod matrix validity of Likert scales via confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 275-308.
12.
Green, B. F. (1954). Attitude measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 335-369). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
Hoijtink, H. (1990). A latent trait model for dichotomous choice data. Psychometrika, 55, 641-656.
14.
Hoijtink, H. (1991). The measurement of latent traits by proximity items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 153-169.
15.
Jaccard, J. , Weber, J., & Lundmark, J. (1975). A multitrait-multimethod analysis of four attitude assessment procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 149-154.
16.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5-53.
17.
Likert, R. , Roslow, S., & Murphy, G. (1934). A simple and reliable method of scoring the Thurstone attitude scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 228-238.
18.
Mueller, D. J. (1986). Measuring social attitudes: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
20.
Reinsch, C. H. (1967). Smoothing by spline functions. Numerishe Mathematik, 10, 177-183.
21.
Rhoads, R. F. , & Landy, F. J. (1973). Measurement of attitudes of industrial work groups toward psychology and testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 197-201.
22.
Roberts, J. S. (1995). Item response theory approaches to attitude measurement (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 7089B-7089B.
23.
Roberts, J. S. , Donoghue, J. R., & Laughlin, J. E. (1996, June 28). A generalized item response model for unfolding responses from a graded scale. Paper presented at the 61st annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
24.
Roberts, J. S. , & Laughlin, J. E. (1996a). A unidimensional item response model for unfolding responses from a graded disagree-agree response scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 231-255.
25.
Roberts, J. S. , & Laughlin, J. E. (1996b). The graded unfolding model: A unidimensional item response model for unfolding graded responses (RR-96-16). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
26.
Safir, M. A. (1937). A comparative study of scales constructed by three psychophysical methods. Psychometrika, 2, 179-198.
27.
Seiler, L. H. , & Hough, R. L. (1970). Empirical comparisons of the Thurstone and Likert techniques. In G. Summers (Ed.), Attitude measurement (pp. 159-173). Chicago: Rand McNally.
28.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927a). Psychophysical analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 38, 368-389.
29.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927b). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
30.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927c). The method of paired comparisons for social values. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26, 249-269.
31.
Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. The American Journal of Sociology, 26, 249-269.
32.
Thurstone, L. L. , & Chave, E. J. (1929). The measurement of attitude: A psychophysical method and some experiments with a scale for measuring attitude toward the church. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
van Schuur, W. H. (1984). Structure in political beliefs: A new model for stochastic unfolding with application to European party activists. Amsterdam: CT Press.
34.
van Schuur, W. H. (1993). Nonparametric unidimensional unfolding for multicategory data. Political Analysis, 4, 41-74.
35.
van Schuur, W. H. , & Kiers, H.A.L. (1994). Why factor analysis is often the incorrect model for analyzing bipolar concepts, and what model can be used instead. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 97-110.
