Centering variables prior to the analysis of moderated multiple regression equations has been advocated for reasons both statistical (reduction of multicollinearity) and substantive (improved interpretation of the resulting regression equations). This article provides a comparison of centered and raw score analyses in least squares regression. The two methods are demonstrated to be equivalent, yielding identical hypothesis tests associated with the moderation effect and regression equations that are functionally equivalent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiken, L. , & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Alexander, R. A. , & DeShon, R. P. (1994). Effect of error variance heterogeneity on the power of tests for regression slope differences. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 308-314.
3.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Cohen, J. (1978). Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 858-866.
5.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). Interaction, nonlinearity and multicollinearity: Implications for multiple regression. Journal of Management, 19, 915-922.
8.
Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 414-417.
9.
Dunlap, W. P. , & Kemery, E. R. (1987). Failure to detect moderating effects: Is multicollinearity the problem? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 418-420.
10.
Dunlap, W. P. , & Kemery, E. R. (1988). Effects of predictor intercorrelations and reliabilities on moderated multiple regression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 248-258.
11.
Findley, M. J. , & Cooper, H. M. (1983). Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 419-427.
12.
Finney, J. W. , Mitchell, R. E., Cronkite, R. C., & Moos, R. H. (1984). Methodological issues in estimating main and interactive effects: Examples from coping/social support and stress field. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 85-98.
13.
Fisicaro, S. A. , & Tisak, J. (1994). A theoretical note on the stochastics of moderated multiple regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 32-41.
14.
Jaccard, J. , & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348-357.
15.
Kreft, I.G.G. , de Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1-21.
16.
Kromrey, J. D. , & Foster-Johnson, L. (1996). Statistically differentiating between interaction and nonlinearity in multiple regression analysis: A Monte Carlo investigation of a recommended strategy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City.
17.
Lubinski, D. , & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). Assessing spurious "moderator effects": Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized ("synergistic") relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 385-393.
18.
Maxwell, S. E. , Delaney, H. D., & Dill, C. A. (1984). Another look at ANCOVA versus blocking. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 136-147.
19.
McClelland, G. H. , & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-389.
20.
Meyer, D. L. (1991). Misinterpretation of interaction effects: A reply to Rosnow and Rosenthal. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 571-573.
21.
Morris, J. H. , Sherman, J. D., & Mansfield, E. R. (1986). Failures to detect moderating effects with ordinary least squares—moderated multiple regression: Some reasons and a remedy. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 282-288.
22.
Mossholder, K. W. , Kemery, E. R., & Bedeian, A. G. (1990). On using regression coefficients to interpret moderator effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 255-263.
23.
Perlin, L. I. , Menagham, E. G., Lieberman, M. A., & Mullan, J. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 337-356.
24.
Robey, R. R. , & Barcikowski, R. S. (1992). Type I error and the number of iterations in Monte Carlo studies of robustness. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 283-288.
25.
Rosnow, R. L. , & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Definition and interpretation of interaction effects. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 143-146.
26.
Rosnow, R. L. , & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Some things you learn aren't so: Cohen's paradox, Asch's paradigm, and the interpretation of interaction. Psychological Science, 6, 3-9.
27.
Saunders, D. R. (1955). The "moderator variable" as a useful tool in prediction. In Proceedings of the 1954 invitational conference on testing problems (pp. 54-58). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
28.
Smith, K. W. , & Sasaki, M. S. (1979). Decreasing multicollinearity: A method for models with multiplicative functions. Sociological Methods and Research, 8, 35-36.
29.
Tate, R. L. (1984). Limitations of centering for interactive models. Sociological Methods and Research, 13, 251-271.
30.
Yi, Y. (1989). On the evaluation of main effects in multiplicative regression models. Journal of the Marketing Research Society, 31, 133-138.
