An important area of inquiry in the assessment of intelligence lies in the area of giftedness. If proper educational decisions are to be made for children referred for gifted services, it is imperative that educational and psychological service providers understand factors influencing the response patterns of children with high levels of academic aptitude. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate four models of intellectual abilities using confirmatory factor analytic methods and data obtained on a sample of 197 children referred for services in an experimental gifted program. Although all four models provided results indicative of a plausible fit, a model posited on a revised version of Horn and Cattell's theory of fluid-crystallized abilities provided the broadest understanding of the cognitive functioning of children referred for gifted services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arbuckle, J. L. (1992). AMOS 3.1 documentation package. Philadelphia: Temple University.
2.
Arbuckle, J. L. (1995). AMOS 3.5 user's guide. Chicago: SmallWaters.
3.
Barry, B. J. (1983). Validity study of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children compared to the Stanford-Binet, Form L-M, in the identification of gifted nine- and ten-year-olds. Unpublished master's thesis, National College of Education, Chicago, IL.
4.
Carroll, J. B. (1983). Studying individual differences in cognitive abilities: Through and beyond factor analysis. In R. F. Dillon & R. R. Schmeck (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-33). New York: Academic Press.
5.
Carroll, J. B. (1989). Factor analysis since Spearman: Where do we stand? What do we know? In R. Kanfer, P. L. Ackerman, & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Abilities, motivation and methodology (pp. 43-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Flanagan, D. P., & McGrew, K. S. (1995). Interpreting intelligence tests from modern Gf-Gc theory: Joint confirmatory factor analysis of the WJ-R and Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test. Unpublished manuscript.
8.
Good, R. H., III , & Lane, S. (1990). Confirmatory factor analysis of the K-ABC and WISC-R for at-risk students: A comparison of hierarchical models. School Psychology Review, 19(4), 492-504.
9.
Gustafsson, J. E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179-203.
10.
Gustafsson, J. E. (1988). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In R. J. Stemberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 35-71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Hayduk, L. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Horn, J. L. (1988). Thinking about human abilities. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate psychology (Rev. ed., pp. 645-865). New York: Academic Press.
13.
Horn, J. L. (1991). Measurement of intellectual capabilities: A review of theory. In K. S. McGrew, J. K. Werder, & R. W. Woodcock(Eds.), Woodcock-Johnson technical manual (pp. 197-232). Chicago: Riverside.
14.
Horn, J. L. (1994). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. In R. J. Stemnberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human intelligence (pp. 443-451). New York: Prentice Hall.
15.
Horn, J. L. , & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253-270.
16.
Horn, J. L , & McArdle, J. J. (1980). Perspectives on mathematical and statistical model building (MASMOB) in research on aging. In L. Poon (Ed.),Aging in the 1980 s: Psychological issues (pp. 503-541). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
Kamphaus, R. W. (1990). K-ABC in historical and current contexts. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8(3), 356-368.
18.
Kamphaus, R. W. , & Reynolds, C. R. (1987). Clinical and research applications with the K-ABC. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
19.
Kaufman, A. S. , Harrison, P. L., & Ittenbach, R. F. (1990). Intelligence testing in the schools. In T. B. Gudtin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (2nd ed., pp. 289-327). New York: John Wiley.
20.
Kaufman, A. S. , & Kaufman, N. L. (1983a). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
21.
Kaufman, A. S. , & Kaufman, N. L. (1983b). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC): Interpretation manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
22.
Kaufman, A. S. , & McLean, J. E. (1986). K-ABC/WISC-R factor analysis for a learning disabled population. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(3), 145-153.
23.
Kaufman, A. S. , & McLean, J. E. (1987). Joint factor analysis of the K-ABC and WISC-R for normal children. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 105-118.
24.
Keith, T. Z. (1985). Questioning the K-ABC: What does it measure?School Psychology Review, 14(1), 9-20.
25.
Keith, T. Z. , Hood, C., Eberhart, S., & Pottebaum, S. M. (1985, April). Factor structure of the K-ABC for referred school children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Las Vegas, NV.
26.
Keith, T. Z. , & Novak, C. (1987). Joint factor structure of the WISC-R and the K-ABC for referred school children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 370-386.
27.
Loehlin, J. C. (1987). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Lohman, D. F. (1989). Human intelligence: An introduction to advances in theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 59, 333-373.
29.
McCallum, R. S. , Karnes, F. A., & Edwards, R. P. (1984). The test of choice for assessment of gifted children: A comparison of the K-ABC, WISC-R, and Stanford-Binet. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2(1), 57-63.
30.
McCallum, R. S. , Karnes, F. A., & Ohler-Stinnett, J. (1985). Construct validity of the K-ABC for gifted children. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 254-259.
31.
McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. New York: Guilford.
32.
Mealor, D. J. , & Curtis, D. J. (1985, April). Comparative analysis of the K-ABC and the WISC-R for selected minority students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Las Vegas, NV.
33.
Naglieri, J. A. , & Anderson, D. F. (1985). Comparison of the WISC-R and K-ABC with gifted students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 3, 175-179.
34.
Naglieri, J. A. , & Jensen, A. R. (1987). Comparison of Black-White differences on the WISC-R and the K-ABC: Spearmian's hypothesis. Intelligence, 11(1), 21-43.
35.
Nolan, R. F. , Watlington, D. K., & Willson, V. L. (1989). Gifted and nongifted race and gender effects on item functioning on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(4), 645-650.
36.
Snow, R. E. (1986). Individual differences and the design of educational programs. American Psychologist, 41, 1029-1039.
37.
Swanson, H. L. , Brandenburg-Ayres, S., & Wallace, S. (1989). Construct validity of the K-ABC with gifted children. The Journal of Special Education, 23(3), 342-352.
38.
Treffinger, D. J. , & Feldhusen, J. F. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(2), 181-193.
39.
Woodcock, R. W. (1990). Theoretical foundations for the WJ-R measures of cognitive ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 231-258.
40.
Woodcock, R. W. (in press). Extending Gf-Gc theory into practice. In J. J. McArdle & R. W. Woodcock (Eds.), Human cognitive abilities in theory and practice. Chicago: Riverside.
