The Spatial Learning Ability Test (SLAT) was designed from a cognitive processing theory to measure specified aspects of spatial processing. Mathematical modeling of item difficulties and response times have supported SLAT as involving primarily spatial processing. Here, four studies on the factorial validity of SLAT are summarized to elaborate nomothetic span. SLAT was the highest loading test on the spatial ability factor in the context of either simple or complex spatial tests. Further, SLAT was less related to verbal-analytic coding skills than many other spatial tests, including a test that contained the same item type. Thus consistent with the construct representation of SLAT as involving spatial processing, the factorial validity studies indicate SLAT as a more pure measure of spatial ability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cooper, L A. , & Shepard, R. N. (1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 75-176). New York: Academic Press.
2.
Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179-197.
3.
Embretson, S. E. (1994). Application of cognitive design systems to test development. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Cognitive assessment: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 107-135). New York: Plenum.
4.
Embretson, S. E. , & Waxman, M. (1989, November). Models for processing and individual differences in spatial folding. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
5.
Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 181-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Shepard, R. N. , & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
