Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1996-08
Investigating the Construct Validity of Scores from a Measure of Student Perceptions about Mathematics Classroom Activities Using Multidimensional Scaling
Interest in student affective and motivational perceptions about learning mathematics is growing. An instrument, the Mathematics Assessment Questionnaire, has been developed for use by classroom teachers to assess these perceptions. Research suggests that teachers and students characterize classrooms by activity settings, and items in the Mathematics Assessment Questionnaire use one of three activities: teacher whole-class instruction, student problem-solving groups, and homework. The present study explores the construct validity of scores of 1,505 junior high school students using three-way multidimensional scaling analyses. Findings are generally supportive of validity. Implications of findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Artzt, A. , & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Protocol analysis of group problem solving in mathe-matics: A cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of group problem solving in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 137-175.
2.
Chang, J. J. , & Carroll, J. D. (1972). How to use INDSCAL, a computer program for canonical decomposition of N-way tables and individual diferences in multidimensional scaling. Unpublished manuscript, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ.
3.
Connell, J. P. (1985). Anew multidimensional measure of children's perceptions of control. Child Development, 56, 1018-1041.
4.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
5.
Fennema, E. , & Sherman, J. (1976). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitude Scales (M.S. No. 1225). JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6(1), 3b.
6.
Harshman, R. A. , & DeSarbo, W. S. (1984). An application of PARAFAC to a small sample problem, demonstrating preprocessing, orthogonality constraints, and split-half diagnostic techniques. In H. G. Law, C. W. Snyder, Jr., J. A. Hattie, & R. P. McDonald (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 602-642). New York: Praeger.
7.
Leinhardt, G. , & Putnam, R. T. (1987). The skill of learning from classroom lessons. American Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 557-587.
8.
McLeod, D. B. , & Adams, V. M. (Eds.). (1989). Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9.
Meece, J. L. , Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents' course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60-70.
10.
Pruzansky, S. (1975). How to use SINDSCAL: A computerprogramfor individual differences in multidimensional scaling. Unpublished manuscript, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ.
11.
Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Tittle, C. K. , & Hecht, D. (1990, June). Manual for users, Mathematics Assessment Questionnaire: A survey of thoughts and feelings (Research edition). New York: Center for Advanced Study in Education, Graduate School, City University of New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324 365)
13.
Tittle, C. K. , Hecht, D., & Moore, P. (1993). Assessment theory and research for classrooms: From taxonomies to constructing meaning in context. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 13-19.
14.
Weinberg, S. L. , & Menil, V. C. (1993). The recovery of structure in linear and ordinal data: INDSCAL versus ALSCAL. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 215-233.
15.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
16.
Wigfield, A. , & Karpathian, M. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children's self-concepts and motivation in achievement situations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 233-261.
