The purpose of the study was to assess the stability of a two-factor model recently proposed for the Gibb Experimental Test of Testwiseness using confirmatory factor analysis. Participants were 173 undergraduate volunteers. Confirmatory factor analyses using LISREL 8 were performed using total scores on the seven skills as data. One- and two-factor models were compared. Results indicated that the data fit the two-factor model and the simpler one-factor model. For this sample, the Gibb test could be characterized as tapping a general proficiency in testwiseness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Diamond, J. J. , & Evans, W. J. (1972). An investigation of the cognitive correlates of testwiseness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 9, 145-150.
2.
Dolly, J. P. , & Williams, K. (1986). Using test-taking strategies to maximize multiple-choice test scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 619-625.
3.
Efron, B. , & Gong, G. (1983). A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. The American Statistician, 37, 36-48.
4.
Fagley, N. S. (1987). Positional response bias in multiple-choice tests of learning: Its relation to testwiseness and guessing strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 95-97.
5.
Gibb, B. (1964). Testwiseness as secondary cue response (doctoral dissertation, Stanford University). Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms (No. 64-7643).
6.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1990). Common factor analysis vs. component analysis: Some well and little known facts. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 33-39.
8.
Hair, J. F., Jr. , Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
9.
Joreskog, K. , & Sorbom, D. (1993a). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the simplist command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
10.
Jöreskog, K. G. , & Sorbom, D. (1993b). Windows LISREL 8.03. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
11.
Masters, G. N. (1988). Item discrimination: When more is worse. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 15-29.
12.
Miller, P. M. , Fagley, N. S., & Lane, D. S., Jr. (1988). Stability of the Gibb (1964) Experimental Test of Testwiseness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1123-1127.
13.
Miller, P. M. , Fuqua, D. R., & Fagley, N. S. (1990). Factor structure of the Gibb Experimental Test of Testwiseness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 203-208.
14.
Millman, J. , Bishop, C. H., & Ebel, R. (1965). An analysis of testwiseness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 707-726.
15.
Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for Windows: Professional statistics, release 60. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
16.
Rogers, W. T. , & Bateson, D. J. (1991). Verification of a model of test-taking behavior of high school seniors. Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 331-350.
17.
Samson, G. (1985). Effects of training in test-taking skills on achievement test performance: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 261-266.
18.
Sarnacki, R. E. (1979). An examination of testwiseness in the cognitive test domain. Review of Educational Research, 49, 252-279.
19.
Slakter, M. J. , Koehler, R. A., & Hampton, S. H. (1970). Grade level, sex, and selected aspects of testwiseness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 119-122.
20.
Thomdike, E. L. (1951). Reliability. In E. F. Lindquist (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 567-573). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
