An approach is described whereby universities may respond to Title IX inquiries from the Office of Civil Rights regarding women's sport equity. This responds to that portion of the law that requires that institutions meet women's sport interest in equal measure to men's. The survey provides results useful for institutional decision making and helps address the specific needs and interests of the student body.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blinde, E. M. , Taub, D. E., & Han, L. (1993). Sport participation and women's personal empowerment: Experience of the college athlete. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 17, 47-60.
2.
Coakley, J. , & White, A. (1992). Making decisions: Gender and sport participation among British adolescents. Sociology of Sport Journal, 9, 20-35.
3.
Gilbreath, J. D. (1977). Sex discrimination and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Personnel Journal, 57, 23-28.
4.
Greenlaw, P. S. , & Kohl, J. P. (1982). Age discrimination and employment guidelines. Personnel Journal, 61, 224-228.
5.
Kunesh, M. A. , Hasbrook, C. A., & Lewthwaithe, R. (1992). Physical activity socialization: Peer interactions and affective responses among a sample of sixth grade girls. Sociology of Sport Journal, 9, 385-396.
6.
Lopiano, D. (1992, December 2). Colleges can achieve equity in sports. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 2.
7.
Phillips, T. D. , & Makris, P. (1993, April 23). Interest a factor in the equity equation. The NCAA News, pp. 4, 24.
8.
Scanlan, T. K. , Carpenter, P. J., Schmidt, G. W., Simons, J. P., & Keeler, B. (1993). An introduction to the sport commitment model. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 1-15.
9.
Steir, W. F., Jr. , & Priest, L. (1993, May 5). Interest argument just a smokescreen. The NCAA News, pp. 4, 20.
