Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this study, 149 WAIS-R protocols were analyzed that were completed by 22 graduate students enrolled in an individual intelligence testing course to ascertain the effectiveness of practice administrations in developing examiner competency. Students made numerous errors, such as assigning too few or too many points to responses and obtaining incorrect basals or ceilings. No improvement was noted over five practice administrations. Errors were reduced over 10 administrations, but students were still making 10.2 errors per protocol. Findings indicate that the standard practice of having students complete only four practice administrations of the WAIS-R does not reduce the number of examiner errors students make. Even completing as many as 10 practice administrations does not develop adequate examiner proficiency. Therefore, current methods for teaching assessment courses need to be modified in order to minimize examiner errors. Until such modifications are made, in-service training and careful interpretation of Full Scale WAIS-R scores are needed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Oakland, T. , & Zimmerman, S. (1986). The course on individual mental assessment: A national survey of course instructors. Professional School Psychology, 1, 51-59.

Slate, J. , & Jones, C. (1988). Errors on the Wechsler scales: Commonly misscored examinee responses. Social and Behavioral Sciences Documents, 18, 31.

Slate, J. , & Jones, C. (1989). Can teaching of the WISC-R be improved? A quasi-experimental exploration. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 408-410.

Slate, J. , & Jones, C. (1990). Identifying students' errors in administering the WAIS-R. Psychology in the Schools, 27, 83-87.

Slate, J. , Jones, C. , Coulter, C. , & Covert, T. (1992). Practitioners' administration and scoring of the WISC-R: Evidence that we do err. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 77-82.

Slate, J. , Jones, C. , & Covert, T. (1992). Rethinking the instructional design for teaching the WISC-R: The effects of practice administrations. College Student Journal, 26, 285-289.

Slate, J. , Jones, C. , & Murray, R. (1991). Teaching administration and scoring of the WAIS-R: An empirical evaluation of practice administrations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 375-379.

Slate, J. , Jones, C. , Murray, R. , & Coulter, C. (1993). Evidence that practitioners err in administering and scoring the WAIS-R. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 156-161.

Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

10.

Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

The Effects of Practice Administrations in Learning to Administer and Score the WAIS-R: A Partial Replication

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References