Following a brief interpretation of a multivariate analysis, purposes of such an analysis are reviewed. A discussion of two primary purposes, prediction and structure identification, and of the secondary purpose of response variable ordering is given. Concluding comments are made pertaining to the necessity of a sound initial choice of response variables and to the questionable use of a multivariate analysis preliminary to simpler analyses if the latter constitute the analysis of interpretive interest.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Conger, A. J. (1984). Statistical considerations. In M. Hersen, L. Michelson, & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), Issues in psychotherapy research (pp. 285-309). New York: Plenum.
2.
Darlington, R. J. (1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Ehrenberg, A.S.C. (1990). The unimportance of relative importance. American Statistician, 44, 260.
4.
Harris, R. J. (1985). A primer of multivariate statistics. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
5.
Huberty, C. J (1989). Problems with stepwise methods-Better alternatives. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 1, pp. 43-70). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
6.
Huberty, C. J (1994). Applied discriminant analysis. New York: Wiley.
7.
Huberty, C. J , & Morris, J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 302-308.
8.
Huberty, C. J , & Wisenbaker, J. M. (1992a). Discriminant analysis: Potential improvements in typical practice. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 169-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
9.
Huberty, C. J , & Wisenbaker, J. M. (1992b). Variable importance in multivariate group comparisons. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 75-91.
10.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.
11.
Kruskal, W. , & Majors, R. (1989). Concepts of relative importance in recent scientific literature. The American Statistician, 43, 2-6.
12.
Li, J. , Olejnik, S. F., & Huberty, C. J (1992, April). Multiple testing with modified Bonferroni methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
13.
MacCorquodale, K. , & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95-107.
14.
Maxwell, S. E. (1992). Recent developments in MANOVA applications. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 137-168). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
15.
McDonald, R. P. (1984). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Mulaik, S. A. (1994). The critique of pure statistics: Artifact and objectivity in multivariate statistics. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 3, pp. 241-289). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
17.
Rencher, A. C. (1992). Interpretation of canonical discriminant functions, canonical variates, and principal components. American Statistician, 46, 217-225.
18.
Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Sullivan, J. L. , & Feldman, S. (1979). Multiple indicators. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Tatsuoka, M. M. (1988). Multivariate analysis. New York: Macmillan.
