This article examines the effects of different weighting schemes on selecting the optimal number of observations in multivariate-multifacet generalizability designs when cost constraints are imposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Marcoulides, G. A. (1989). From hands-on mesurement to job performance: Issues of depend- ability. Journal of Business and Society, 1(2), 1-20.
2.
Marcoulides, G. A. , & Goldstein, Z. (1991). Selecting the number of observations in multivariate measurement studies under budget constraints. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 573-584.
3.
Marcoulides, G. A. , & Goldstein, Z. (1992). The optimization of multivariate generalizability studies with budget constraintsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 301-308.
4.
Shavelson, R. J. , Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44(6), 922-932.
5.
Short, L. , Webb, N. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1986, April). Issues in multivariate generalizability: Weighting schemes and dimensionality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
6.
Smith, P. (1982). A confidence interval approach for variance component estimates in the context of generalizability theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 459-465.
7.
Srinivasan, V. , & Shocker, A. D. (1973). Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgements. Psychometrika, 38(4), 473-493.
8.
Terman, L. M. , & Merrill, M. A. (1973). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Chicago: Riverside Publishing.
9.
Webb, N. M. , & Shavelson, R. J. (1981). Multivariate generalizability of general educational ratings. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 13-22.
10.
Weichang, L. (1990). Multivariate generalizability of hierarchical measurements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
