The Prediction of Predictability Revisited: Differential Predictability Applied to Managerial Selection

Abstract

Ghiselli's (1956) differential predictability procedure was applied to individual managerial assessment. Candidates for managerial positions (N = 452) were administered a battery of tests as part of the individual assessment selection procedure. This sample was divided into two equal-size groups; a Derivation Group and a Cross-Validation Group. The criterion was the candidate's organizational level; the predictor was a measure of cognitive ability provided by scores on the Adaptability Test. Need for Financial Reward, a subscale of the Self-Description Inventory, was identified as a moderator in the Derivation Group, however, sub grouping chi-square analyses and moderated multiple regression failed to corroborate this finding. Dependent on the selection ratio, use of the moderator was shown to have some limited utility in the Cross-Validation Group, however, its accuracy did not exceed that obtained through use of regression analysis.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnold, H. J. (1982). Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 143-174.

Arnold, H. J. (1984). Testing moderator variable hypotheses: A reply to Stone and Hollenbeck. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 214-224.

Bruning, J. L. and Kintz, B. L. (1987). Computational handbook of statistics (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Co.

Ghiselli, E. E. (1956). Differentiation of individuals in terms of their predictability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 40, 374-377.

Ghiselli, E. E. (1960). The prediction of predictability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 3-8.

Ghiselli, E. E. (1963). Moderating effects and differential reliability and validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 81-86.

Ghiselli, E. E. (1971). Explorations in managerial talent. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.

Ghiselli, E. E. (1972). Comment on the use of moderator variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 270.

Reynolds, C. R. (1982). Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

10.

Schmidt, F. L. , and Hunter, J. E. (1978). Moderator research and the law of small numbers. Personnel Psychology, 31, 215-232.

11.

Schmidt, F. L. , and Hunter, J. E. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

12.

Schmidt, F. L. , Hunter, J. E. , McKenzie, R. C. , and Muldrow, T. W. (1979). Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 609-626.

13.

Stone, E. F. (1988). Moderator variables in research: A review and analysis of conceptual and methodological issues. In K. Rowland and G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management: Vol. 6 (pp. 191-229). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

14.

Stone, E. F. , and Hollenbeck, J. R. (1984). Some issues associated with the use of moderated regression. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 195-213.

15.

Stone, E. F. , and Hollenbeck, J. R. (1989). Clarifying some contro-versial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 3-10.

16.

Tiffin, J. , and Lawshe, C. L. (1967). Adaptability test. Chicago, IL: Research Science Associates.