Negative coefficients of reliability, sometimes returned by the standard formulae for estimation of the internal-consistency reliability, are neither theoretically nor numerically correct. Alternate strategies for test development in this special case are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities.British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296-322.
2.
Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika, 16, 297-337.
3.
Hoyt, C. (1941). Test reliability estimated by analysis of variance.Psychometrika, 6, 153-160.
4.
Jackson, R. W. (1939). Reliability of mental tests.British Journal of Psychology, 29, 267-287.
5.
Kelley, T. L. (1947). Fundamentals of statistics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6.
Krus, D. J. and Helmstadter, G. C. (1987). The relationship between correlations and internal consistency notions of test reliability.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 911-915.
7.
Kuder, G. F. and Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability.Psychometrika, 2, 151-160.
8.
Magnusson, D. (1966). Test theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9.
Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data.British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271-295.
10.
Wiersma, W. and Jurs, S. G. (1990). Educational Measurement and Testing. (2nd Ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
