Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1993-09
First-Order and Higher-Order Factors of Creative Social Intelligence Within Guilford'S Structure-Of-Intellect Model: A Reanalysis of a Guilford Data Base
The major purpose of this investigation was to ascertain through the use of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis (CM-LFA) (Joreskog and Sorbom, 1989b) how accurately each of several hypothesized combinations of first-order and higher-order factors reflecting creativity in social intelligence for a sample of 192 high school students in a middle-class suburban community could describe the covariation within selected submatrixes taken from the total correlation matrix originally analyzed by Hendricks, Guilford, and Hoepfner (1969). Exploratory factor analyses involving both orthogonal (varimax) and oblique (promax) solutions were also completed and compared with the original orthogonal factor analysis of the total correlation matrix by Hendricks et al. The exploratory factor analyses showed a moderate degree of correspondence with the solution offered by Hendricks et al. It was concluded that CMLFA lent support to hypothesized first- and higher-order factors within the context of Guilford's structure-of-intellect model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bachelor, P. (1986-87). Higher-order factors in Guilford's SOI model: Divergent productions.Educational Research Quarterly, 11(2), 29-40.
2.
Bachelor, P. (1989). Maximum likelihood confirmatory factor-analytic investigation of factors within Guilford's structure-or-intellect model.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 797-804.
3.
Barron, F. and Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality.Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.
4.
Bentler, P. M. , and Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psycho- logical Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
5.
Brody, E. D. and Brody, N. (1976). Intelligence: Nature, determinants and consequences. New York: Academic Press.
6.
Butcher, H. J. (1973). Intelligence and creativity. In P. Kline (Ed.), New approaches in psychological measurement. New York: Wiley.
7.
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities and their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Miffin.
8.
Cliff, N. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence.Psychometrika, 31(1), 33-42.
9.
Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Test validation. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational Measurement (2nd ed.), pp. 443-507. Washington, DC: American Council of Education.
10.
Eysenck, H. J. (1973). The inequality of man. London: Temple Smith.
11.
Eysenck, H. J. (1979). The structure and measurement of intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12.
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect.American Psychologist, 14, 469-479.
13.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Guilford, J. P. (1981). Higher-order structure-of-intellect abilities.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 411-435.
15.
Guilford, J. P. (1985). The structure-of-intellect model. In B. B. Wolman (ed.), Handbook of intelligence. New York: Wiley.
16.
Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes in the structure-of-intellect model.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1-4.
17.
Guilford, J. P. and Hoepfner, R. (1971). The analysis of intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Hendricks, M. , Guilford, J. P., and Hoepfner, R. (1969). Measuring creative social intelligence (Report No. 42 from the Psychological Laboratory). Los Angeles: The University of Southern California.
19.
Horn, J. L. (1977). Personality and ability theory. In R. S. Cattel and R. M. Dreger (Eds.), Handbook of modem personality theory. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.
20.
Horn, J. L. and Knapp, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford's structure-of-intellect model.Psychological Bulletin, 80(1), 33-43.
21.
Horn J. L. andKnapp, J. R. (1974). Thirty wrongs do not make a right: Reply to Guilford.Psychological Bulletin, 81(8), 502-504.
22.
Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (1989a). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
23.
Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (1989b). LISREL 7: User's reference guide (1st ed.). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.
24.
Khattab, A. A. , Michael, W. B., and Hocevar, D. (1982). The construct validity of higher order structure-of-intellect abilities in a battery of tests emphasizing the product of transformations: A confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 1090-1105.
25.
Mace, D. E. , Michael, W. B., and Hocevar, D. (1985). Validity of higher-order ability constructs in structure-of-intellect tests all involving semantic content and operations of cognition or evaluation: A confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 353-359.
26.
Marsh, H. W. and Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factory analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher- order factor models and their invariance across groups.Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582.
27.
Michael, W. B. and Bachelor, P. (1990). Higher-order structure-of-intellect creativity factors in divergent production tests: A re- analysis of a Guilford data base.Creativity Research Journal, 3(1), 58-74.
28.
Moss, F. A. , Hunt, T., Omwake, K. T., and Woodward, L. G. (1930-1955). Social Intelligence Test: George Washington University Series (3 editions). Washington, DC: George Washington University, Center for Psychological Services.
29.
SAS Institute Inc. (1985). SAS user's guide: Statistics (version 5 ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
30.
Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses.Harper's Magazine, 140, 227-235.
31.
Thorndike, R. L. (1936). Factor analysis of social and abstract intelligence.Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 231-233.
32.
Ulosevich, S. N. , Michael, W. B., and Bachelor, P. (1991). Higher- order factors in structure-of-intellect (SOI) aptitude tests hypothesized to portray constructs of military leadership: A re-analysis of an SOI data base.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 15-37.
