Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The major purpose of the study was to demonstrate the utility of Guttman's facet analysis in serving as a methodological approach for instrument development and validation. A Likert-type survey for measuring college students' attitudes toward alcohol was the vehicle for the demonstration. Guttman's facet analysis was used to construct items according to a carefully designed mapping sentence which specified the basic attitude components of interest to the study. Namely, four basic facets were hypothesized to underlie students' attitudes toward alcohol use. Likert-type survey items were written to match all combinations of the elements of the hypothesized facets in an attempt to sample the content domain representatively. These efforts, as well as an interjudge agreement process, were undertaken to address issues of content and construct validity during instrument construction. The survey was administered to a sample of college students (n = 1049). The coefficient alpha reliability estimate was found to be .91. Subsequent multidimensional scaling analyses provided evidence in support of the four hypothesized facets measured by the instrument and thus its construct validity. The substantive findings related to students' attitudes toward alcohol are also discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blumberg, P. and Felner, J. (Boston, 1980). A practical methodology for the systematic generation of equivalent multiple-choice tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.

Canter, D. V. (Ed.) (1985). Facet theory: Approaches to social research. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Dancer, L. S. (1986). Facet analysis of suicidal behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

Dancer, L. S. (1989). Facet analysis of the Client Needs Assessment Instrument. Paper presented at the 97th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.

Dancer, L. S. (1990). Introduction to facet theory and its applications. Applied psychology: An international review, 39(4), 365-377.

Edmundson, E. W. and Koch, W. R. (April, 1990). A Facet Analysis Approach to Content and Construct Validity. National Council on Measurement in Education Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts.

Goodman, L. A. and Kruskal, W. H. (1979). Measures of association for cross classification. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258-348). New York: Free Press.

Guttman, L. (1957). Introduction to facet design and analysis. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Psychology, Brussels, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

10.

Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469-506.

11.

Guttman, L. (1981). What is not what in theory construction. In I. Borg (Ed.), Multidimensional data representations: When and why (pp. 47-64). Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.

12.

Guttman, R. , Epstein, E. , Amir, M. , and Guttman, L. (1990). A structural theory of spatial abilities. Applied psychological measurement, 14(3), 217-236.

13.

Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling. I and II. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27, 115-129.

14.

Kruskal, J. B. and Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

15.

Levy, S. (1981). Lawful roles of facets in social theories. In I. Borg (Ed.), Multidimensional data representations: When and why pp. 65-107). Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.

16.

Levy, S. (1982). Use of drugs and medication in Israel (Institute Monograph No. 865). Jerusalem: The Israel Institute of Applied Social Research.

17.

Levy, S. (1990). Values and deeds. Applied psychology: An inter- national review, 39(4), 379-400.

18.

MacCallum, R. (1981). Evaluating goodness of fit in nonmetric multidimensional scaling by ALSCAL. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 377-382.

19.

Millman, J. (1974). Criterion-referenced measurement. In W. J. Popham (Ed.), Evaluation in education. Washington, D. C.: American Educational Research Association.

20.

Napior, D. (1972). Nonmetric multidimensional techniques for sum- mated ratings. In R. N. Shepard , A. K. Romney and S. B. Nerlove (Eds.). Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences: Vol. 1 Theory. (pp: 157-178). New York: Seminar Press.

21.

Roid, G. H. and Haladyna, T. M. (1982). A technology for test-item writing. New York: Academic Press.

22.

Roskam, E. E. (1981). Data theory and scaling: A methodological essay on the role and use of data theory and scaling in psychology. In I. Borg (Ed.). Multidimensional data representations: When and why. (pp: 193-229). Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.

23.

Shepard, R. N. (1962). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I and II. Psychometrika, 27, 125-140, 219-246.

24.

Shye, S. (Ed.) (1978). Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

25.

Shye, S. (1985). Multiple scaling. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

26.

Tziner, A. E. (1987). The facet analytic approach to research and data processing. New York: Peter Lang.

27.

Young, F. W. and Lewyckyj, R. (1979). ALSCAL-4 users guide. Chapel Hill, NC: Psychometric Laboratory.

28.

Young, F. W. and Hamer, R. M. (1987). Multidimensional scaling: History, theory and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.