Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Covariance structure analysis was used to confirm that the moral orientation and moral judgment subtests of the Moral Development Test (MDT) (Ma, 1987) captured the hierarchical stage structure of moral development predicted by Kohlberg's stage theory of moral development. Furthermore, the simplex ordering between the stage scores of the MDT subtests was shown to be invariant in adolescents and adults across two cultures-British and Hong Kong Chinese. In addition, the structural part of the simplex model for the moral judgment subtest was shown to be invariant across the two cultures. However, the hypothesis of invariance of the structural part of the simplex model across the two cultures for the moral orientation was rejected.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bentler, P. M. and Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.

Boom, J. and Molenaar, P. C. M. (1989). A developmental Model of Hierarchical stage structure in objective moral judgments. Developmental Review, 9, 133-145.

Davison, M. L. , Stephen, R. , and Swanson, D. B. (1978). Stage structure in objective moral judgments. Developmental Psychology, 14(2), 137-146.

Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: the radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. New York: Columbia University Press.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). Estimation and testing of simplex models. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23(Part 2), 121-145.

Jöreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Mooresville, Indiana: Scientific Software, Inc.

Jöreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL VII: User's reference guide. Moorseville, Indiana: Scientific Software, Inc.

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Ma, H. K. (1987). Construction and validation of an objective measure of moral orientation and moral judgment. Unpublished manuscript, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

10.

Ma, H. K. (1988). Objective moral judgment in Hong Kong, Mainland China, and England. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19(1), 78-95.

11.

Ma, H. K. (1989). Moral orientation and moral judgment in adolescents in Hong Kong, Mainland China, and England. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20(2), 152-177.

12.

Ma, H. K. (1990). Construction and validation of an objective measure of the affective and cognitive aspects of moral development in Hong Kong. Unpublished manuscript, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

13.

Rest, J. R. (1975a). Recent research on an objective test of moral judgment: How the important issues of a moral dilemma are defined. In D. DePalma and J. M. Foley (Eds.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

14.

Rest, J. R. (1975b). Test of moral judgment: A strategy of analyzing developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 11(6), 738-748.

15.

Rest, J. R. (1976). New approaches in the assessment of moral judgment. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Covariance Structure Analysis of a Test of Moral Orientation and Moral Judgment

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References