Given the psychometric shortcomings of existing measures of Kolb's (1985) learning style modes, new scales are developed and administered to two samples (N = 509 and 153). Subsequent analyses establish the internal-consistency and test-retest reliability of the scales, and the two-dimensional structure of the instrument is confirmed by multiple confirmatory factor analyses in both samples. Finally, relationships between learning style scores and respondent's college major (in sample one) provide preliminary support for the validity of the new scales.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bentler, P. M. and Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
2.
Ford, J. , MacCallum, R., and Tait, M. (1986). The application of factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291-314.
3.
Freedman, R. D. and Stumpf, S. A. (1978). What can one learn from the learning style inventory?Academy of Management Journal, 21, 275-282.
4.
Freedman, R. D. and Stumpf, S. A. (1980). Learning style theory: Less than meets the eye. Academy of Management Review, 5, 445-447.
5.
Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 167-184.
6.
Highhouse, S. and Doverspike, D. (1987). The validity of the learning style inventory 1985 as a predictor of cognitive style and occupational preference. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 749-753.
7.
Jöreskog, K. G. and Sörbom, D. (1985). Lisrel VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
8.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research: Third edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
9.
Kolb, D. A. (1976). The learning style inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer.
10.
Kolb, D. A. (1985). The learning style inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer.
11.
Merritt, S. L. and Marshall, J. C. (1984). Reliability and construct validity of ipsative and normative forms of the learning style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 463-472.
12.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory: Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. In. B. W. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 2, 3-43.
14.
Veres, J. G. , Sims, R. R., and Shake, L. G. (1987). The reliability and classification stability of the learning style inventory in corporate settings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 1127-1133.
15.
Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.
16.
Wolfe, D. M. and Kolb, D. A. (1984). Career development, personal growth, and experiential learning. In Organizational psychology: Fourth edition. (D. A. Kolb, I. R. Rubin, and J. M. McIntyre, Eds.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
