Algina, J. (1989). Elements of classical reliability theory and generalizability theory. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 1, pp. 137-169). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
Brennan, R. L. (1983). Elements of generalizability theory. Iowa City, IA: ACT Publications.
3.
Cronbach, L. J. , Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., and Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of measurements. New York: Wiley and Sons.
4.
Eason, S. J. (1991). Why generalizability theory yields better results than classical test theory: A primer with concrete examples. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in educational research: Substantive findings, methodological developments (Vol. 1, pp. 83-98). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5.
Hoyt, C. J. (1941). Test reliability estimated by analysis of variance. Psychometrika, 6, 153-160.
6.
LaGaccia, S. (1991). Methodology choices in a cohort of education dissertations. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in educational research: Substantive findings, methodological developments (Vol. 1, pp. 149-158). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7.
Lawson, S. (1991). One parameter latent trait measurement: Do the results justify the effort? In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in educational research: Substantive findings, methodological developments (Vol. 1, pp. 159-168). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8.
Lindquist, E. F. (1953). Design and analysis of experiments in education and psychology. Boston: Houghton Miffin.
9.
Locke, L. F. , Spirduso, W. W., and Silverman, S. J. (1987). Proposals that work: A guide for planning dissertations and grant proposals (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
10.
Medley, D. M. and Mitzel, H. E. (1963). Measuring classroom behavior by systematic observation. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 247-328). Chicago: Rand McNally.
11.
Reinhardt, B. (1991, January). Factors affecting coefficient alpha: A mini Monte Carlo study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 327 574)
12.
Rowley, G. L. (1976). The reliability of observational measures. American Educational Research Journal, 13, 51-59.
13.
Sax, G. (1980). Principles of educational and psychological measurement and evaluation (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14.
Schneider, A. L. and Darcy, R. E. (1984). Policy implications of using significance tests in evaluation research. Evaluation Review, 8, 573-582.
15.
Shavelson, R. J. , Webb, N. M., and Burstein, L. (1986). Measurement of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 50-91). New York: MacMillan.
16.
Shavelson, R. J. , Webb, N. M., and Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 922-932.
17.
Thompson, B. (1989). Statistical significance, result importance, and result generalizability: Three noteworthy but somewhat different issues. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22(1), 2-5.
18.
Webb, N. M. , Rowley, G. L., and Shavelson, R. J. (1988). Using generalizability theory in counseling and development. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21, 81-90.
19.
Willson, V. L. (1980). Statistical techniques in AERJ articles: 1969 to 1978. Educational Researcher, 9(6), 5-10.
20.
Wright, B. D. and Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA.
