Carver, R. P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 29, 378-399.
2.
Eason, S. H. , and Daniel, L. G. (1989, January). Trends and methodological practices in several cohorts of dissertations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Houston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 306 299).
3.
Fish, L. J. (1988). Why multivariate methods are usually vital. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21, 130-137.
4.
Kupfersmid, J. (1988). Improving what is published: A model in search of an editor. American Psychologist, 43, 635-642.
5.
Schneider, A. L. , and Darcy, R. E. (1984). Policy implications of using significance tests in evaluation research. Evaluation Review, 8, 573-582.
6.
Shaver, J. P. (1985). Chance and nonsense. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(1), 57-60.
7.
Thompson, B. (1985a). Alternate methods for analyzing data from education experiments. Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 50-55.
8.
Thompson, B. (1985b, November). Misuse of contingency test statistics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MS.
9.
Thompson, B. (1987, April). The use (and misuse) of statistical significance testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 287 868)
10.
Thompson, B. (1988). A note about significance testing. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 20, 146-148.
