This study applied classical measurement theory to investigate the measurement characteristics of both parts of the Finding Embedded Figures Test (FEFT), when the test is administered in either a "no guessing" supply format or a multiple-choice selection format, and when the FEFT is administered to either undergraduate college students or to middle-school students. Coefficient alpha for the FEFT ranged between 0.81 and 0.90 across samples and administration formats. Items generally had desirable psychometric characteristics across studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berry, J. W. (1966). Temne and Eskimo perceptual skills. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 207-229.
2.
Crocker, L. and Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
3.
Donlon, T. F. (1977, May). A practical assessment of field dependence independence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the New England Educational Research Association, Manchester-Bedford, NH. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 139 827)
4.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Melancon, J. G. and Thompson, B. (1987, November). Measurement characteristics of a test of field-independence: Literature review and development of the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Mobile, AL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 292 823)
6.
Melancon, J. G. and Thompson, B. (1988, November). Latent trait measurement calibrations for the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Louisville, KY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 300 463)
7.
Melancon, J. and Thompson, B. (1989a). Measurement characteristics of the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Psychology in the Schools, 26(1), 69-78.
8.
Melancon, J. and Thompson, B. (1989b, January). Measurement characteristics of a "no-guessing" administration of the Finding Embedded Figures Test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Houston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 487)
9.
Melancon, J. and Thompson, B. (1989c, January). The nature of field independence: Percentiles and factor structure of the Finding Embedded Figures Test-research edition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Houston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 520)
10.
Melancon, J. and Thompson, B. (1990, January). Measurement characteristics of the Finding Embedded Figures Test in "speed' versus "power" administrations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX.
11.
Pitts, M. C. and Thompson, B. (1984). Cognitive styles as mediating variables in inferential comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 426-435.
12.
Thompson, B. (1989). Statistical significance, result importance, and result generalizability: Three noteworthy but somewhat different issues. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22(1). 2-5.
13.
Thompson, B. and Levitov, J. E. (1985). Using microcomputers to score and evaluate test items. Collegiate Microcomputer, 3, 163-168.
14.
Thompson, B. and Melancon, J. (1987a). Finding Embedded Figures Test. New Orleans: Psychometrics Group.
15.
Thompson. B. and Melancon, J. G. (1987b). Measurement characteristics of the Group Embedded Figures Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 765-772.
16.
Thompson, B. and Melancon, J. (1988, January). Phase two study of the measurement characteristics of a test of field-independence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio.
17.
Thompson, B. , Pitts, M. M., and Gipe, J. P. (1983). Use of the Group Embedded Figures Test with children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 199-203.
18.
Witkin, H. A. (1979). Socialization, culture and ecology in the development of group and sex differences in cognitive style. Human Development, 22, 358-372.
19.
Witkin, H. A. , Moore, C. A., Oltman, P. K., Goodenough, D. R..Friedman, F., Owen, D. R., and Raskin. E. (1977). Role of the field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles in academic evolution: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 197-211.
20.
Witkin, H. A. , Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., and Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
