Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A stratified random sample of 82 subjects, 4 to 25 years of age, was used to examine relationships between intransitivity of paired-comparison responses and age of subjects. Intransitivity scores of early childhood subjects (4-7 years) were significantly higher than those of the middle childhood group (p < .05), adolescents (p < .001), and young adults (p < .01). Comparisons between other group means were not significant. It was concluded that there is a floor level (6-7 years) below which response intransitivity increases significantly. Above the floor level, intransitivity appears to generalize across age groups. Alternative hypotheses based on a cognitive-developmental theory and a content-specific perspective are given as possible explanations for results.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ace, M. E. and Dawis, R. V. (1972). The contributions of questionnaire length, format and type of score to response inconsistency. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 1003-1011.

Bauer, D. (1976). An exploratory study of developmental changes in children's fears. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 69-74.

Benson, P. H. (1958). Increasing the predictive efficiency of preference counts from paired comparisons of personality traits. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 18, 283-291.

Bezembinder, T. G. (1981). Circularity and consistency in paired comparisons. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 16-37.

Green, K. (1985). The paired comparisons method in educational research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 567-575.

Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hendel, D. D. (1975). Paired comparisons intransitivity: Trends across domains of content and across groups of subjects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 865-868.

Hendel, D. D. (1979). Paired comparisons intransitivity: Is it relatively stable over time? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 779-784.

Hendel, D. D. and Weiss, D. J. (1970). Individual inconsistency and reliability of measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 579-593.

10.

Hull, R. B. and Buhyoff, G. J. (1981). On the law of comparative judgment: Scaling with intransitive observers and multidimensional stimuli. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1083-1089.

11.

Kendall, M. G. (1970). Rank correlation methods (4th ed.). New York: Hafner Press.

12.

Marks, I. M. (1987). Fears, phobias, and rituals. New York: Oxford University Press.

13.

Mishisato, S. (1984). Forced classifications: A simple application of quantification method. Psychometrika, 49, 25-36.

14.

Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186.

15.

Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.

16.

Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.

Paired-Comparisons Intransitivity Related to Age of Subjects

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References