Automated Psychological Testing: Method of Administration,Need for Approval,and Measures of Anxiety

Abstract

The Eysenck Personality Inventory, Endler's Multidimensional Anxiety Scales, Rotter's Internal-External Locus of Control Scale, and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale were administered on two occasions separated by a period of two months to three groups of subjects. One group took the standard paper-and-pencil versions of the tests; the second group, the computerized versions; and the third group, a computerized version on one occasion and a paper-and-pencil version on the other. Test-retest reliability was greatest for computer administration. There was a strong tendency for individuals in the computer condition to give responses related to low trait anxiety and to high standing on "internality." These measures also were related to high scores on social desirability or "need for approval." The results suggest that `'faking good' leads to low scores on "anxiety" scales and that this effect is particularly strong when tests are administered by computer. The data raise some doubts about the assumed efficacy of computerized testing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bartram, D. and Bayliss, R. (1984). Automated testing: Past, present and future. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57, 221-237.

Crowne, D. P. and Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.

Davis, C. and Cowles, M. (1988). A laboratory study of temperament and arousal: A test of Gale's hypothesis. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 101-116.

Endler, N. S. , Edwards J. M. , and Vitelli, R. (in press). The Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Evan, W. M. and Miller, J. R. (1969). Differential effects on response bias of computer vs. conventional administration of a social science questionnaire. Behavioral Science, 14, 216-227.

Eysenck, H. J. and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1968). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

Kosen, D. , Kitchen, C. , Kochen, M. , and Stodolosky, D. (1970). Psychological testing by computer: Effect on response bias. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 30, 808-910.

Lucas, R. W. (1974). The development of a computer based system of patient interrogation. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Glasgow, Scotland.

Lucas, R. W. , Mullin, P. J. , Luna, C. D. , and Mclnroy, D. C. (1977). Psychiatrists and a computer as interrogators of patients with alcohol related illness: A comparison. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 160-167.

10.

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, (1, Whole No. 609).

11.

Skinner, H. A. and Allen, B. A. (1983). Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug and tobacco use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 267-275.

12.

Slack, W. V. and Van Cura, L. J. (1968). Patient reaction to computer-based medical interviewing. Computers and Biomedical Research, 1, 527.