Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Relationships of National Teacher Examination (NTE) Communication Skills (CS) and General Knowledge (GK) test scores with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) characteristics, self-reported academic problems, and 14 skill self-ratings were examined for 161 college teaching majors. The purpose was to determine if such personality data, collected 4 years before the students took the National Teacher Examination (NTE) tests, could explain variability in the NTE scores that could not be explained by high school and college classroom achievement. Results from multiple regression analyses indicated that after controlling for classroom achievement, gender, and whether or not students were elementary/special or secondary majors, the personality variables could explain a statistically significant percentage of the CS (12%) and GK (17%) variances. An irony was observed in that MBTI sensing/judging types attained lower NTE scores than would be expected from their classroom achievement, although they also are the type that most often chooses teaching as a vocation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anrig, G. R. (1986). Teacher education and teacher testing: The rush to mandate. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 447-451.

Ayres, Q. W. (1983). Student achievement at predominantly white and predominantly black universities. American Educational Research Journal, 20 (2) 291-304.

College Board (1982). Student bulletin 1982-83. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

Cross, I. H. (1985). Validation of the NTE tests for validation issues. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 4, 7-10.

Ihle, J. and Nisbet, J. (1982). Study Behaviors Inventory. Jack E. Ihle, Counseling and Psychological Services, Ball State, Muncie, IN 47306.

Keirsey, D. and Bates, M. (1978). Please understand me. Del Mar, CA: Promethean Books, Inc.

Myers, I. B. (1980). Gifts differing. Del Mar, CA: Promethean Books, Inc.

Myers, I. B. and McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and the use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

NTE Programs (1987). 1987-88 Bulletin of information. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

10.

Ruble, V. E. , Mahan, M. P. , and Schurr, K. T. (1987). Multiple uses of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator within an athletic program. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Conference on Counseling Athletes, Springfield, MA.

11.

Schurr, K. T. and Ruble, V. E. (in press). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the second-year: Survival and gravitation to appropriate and manageable major fields. Journal of Psychological Type.

12.

Schurr, K. T. , Ruble, V. E. , and Ellen, A. S. (1985). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and demographic characteristics of students attending and not attending a college basketball game. Journal of Sport Behavior, 8, 181-194.

13.

Schurr, K. T. , Ruble, V. E. , & Henriksen, L. W. (in press). Relationships of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality characteristics and self-reported academic problems and skill ratings with Scholastic Aptitude Test scores. Educational And Psychological Measurement.

14.

Schurr, K. T. , Wittig, A. F. , Ellen, A. S. , and Ruble, V. E. (1988). Demographic and personality characteristics associated with persistent, occasional, and non-attendance of male university basketball games by college students. Journal of Sport Behavior, 11.

15.

Wittig, A. F. , Schurr, K. T. , and Ruble, V. E. (1987) Gender, academic preparation, and personality factors in accounting for the three-year achievement and attrition of honors students. Forum for Honors, 17, 26-35.

Relationships of National Teacher Examination Communication Skills and General Knowledge Scores with High School and College Grades,Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Characteristics,and Self-Reported Skill Ratings and Academic Problems

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References