Item bias indices are frequently used in the process of screening items. Although many bias indices exist and much has been written about the agreement between indices, relatively little has been done to investigate the stability of a particular index across comparable samples. Using the bootstrap methodology, this study investigated the stability of the Angoff delta item bias index. The results support this use of the new methodology, but suggest that sampling error in estimating the statistic needs to be closely monitored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Angoff, W. H. (1982). Use of difficulty and discrimination indices for detecting item bias. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 96-116.
2.
Angoff, W. H. , and Ford, S. F. (1973). Item-race interaction on a test of scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 95-105.
3.
Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
4.
Hieronymous, A. N. , Lindquist, E. F., and Hoover, H.D. (1979) Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, Multilevel Edition. New York: Riverside Publishing.
5.
Hoover, H. D. , and Kolen, M. J. (1984). The reliability of six item bias indices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 173-181.
6.
Shepard, L. A. , Camilli, G., and Williams, D. M. (1985). Validity of approximation techniques for detecting item bias. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 77-105.
