Effects of Profile Elevation,Scatter,and Shape on Discriminant Analysis Results

Abstract

Under the heading of "profile analysis" most multivariate statistical textbooks describe the "levels" and the "parallelism" hypotheses, which test group profile differences in elevation and combined scatter/shape, respectively. It is argued that although both tests are very useful tools, they should be incorporated into a strategy allowing for more specific analyses. A detailed profile analysis should be capable of separating the effects of elevation, scatter, and shape on single discriminant functions and contrasts. Procedural steps of such a Multistage Discriminant Analysis are outlined. Emphasis is placed on the geometrical representation of group profile configurations. The procedure is illustrated with an artificial data set.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bhapkar, V. P. (1984). On nonparametric profile analysis of several multivariate samples. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 9, 285-296.

Butler, J. K. (1983). A vector model for describing and comparing profiles. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 43, 747-758.

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The data box: Its ordering of total resources in terms of possible relational systems. In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 67-128). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Conger, A. J. (1974). Estimating profile reliability and maximally reliable composites. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 9, 85-104.

Conger, A. J. and Lipshitz, R. (1973). Measures of reliability for profiles and test batteries. Psychometrika, 38, 411-427.

Cooley, W. W. and Lohnes, P. R. (1971). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Wiley.

Cronbach, L. J. and Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 456-473.

Dixon, W. J. (1981). BMDP Statistical Software 1981. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Groff, M. G. (1983). A scheme for conducting two-sample profile analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 169-181.

10.

Hakstian, A. R. , Roed, J. C. , and Lind, J. C. (1979). Two-sample T2 procedure and the assumption of homogeneous covariance matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1255-1263.

11.

Harris, R. J. (1975). A primer of multivariate statistics. New York: Academic Press.

12.

Horn, J. L. (1969). Factor analyses with variables of different metric. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 29, 753-762.

13.

Morrison, D. F. (1976). Multivariate statistical methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

14.

Nunnally, J. C. (1962). The analysis of profile data. Psychological Bulletin, 59, 311-319.

15.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

16.

Nunnally, J. C. and Kotsch, W. E. (1983). A reciprocity principle that permits profile-factoring with very large numbers of people. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 43, 693-703.

17.

Olson, C. L. (1976). On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 579-586.

18.

Overall, J. E. and Klett, C. J. (1972). Applied multivariate analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

19.

Ross, J. (1964). Mean performance and the factor analysis of learning data. Psychometrika, 29, 67-73.

20.

Skinner, H. A. (1978). Differentiating the contribution of elevation, scatter, and shape in profile similarity. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 38, 297-308.

21.

Skinner, H. A. (1979). Dimensions and clusters: A hybrid approach to classification. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 327-341.

22.

SPSS Inc. (1983). SPSSX User's Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.

23.

Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.

24.

Timm, N. H. (1975). Multivariate analysis. Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.

25.

Yarnold, P. R. (1984). The reliability of a profile. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 44, 49-59.