Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; LISREL) was used to (a) validate the Self Description Questionnaire III (SDQ III) subscales measuring general, school, English, and mathematics self-concepts for a sample of 898 (285 low track, 613 high track) grades 11 and 12 students, and (b) test the equivalency of the factor structure across academic track. The results confirmed a 4-factor structure and revealed all factor loadings and covariances to be invariant across groups; 11 of 21 uniquenesses were noninvariant. Although, in a strict statistical sense, the differentially reliable items bore implications of bias in favor of the high track, these discrepancies, on the basis of absolute values, were judged to be of little practical significance. Overall, in light of the stringency of LISREL CFA procedures in general, and those used in this study in particular, the SDQ III demonstrated exceptionally superior psychometric properties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benson, J. (1987). Detecting item bias in affective scales. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 47, 55-67.
2.
Bentler, P. M. and Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
3.
Byrne, B. M. (in press a). Measuring adolescent self-concept: Factorial validity and equivalency of the SDQ III across gender. Multivariate Behavioral Research.
4.
Byrne, B. M. (in press b). Adolescent self-concept, ability grouping, and social comparison: Reexamining academic track differences in high school. Youth and Society.
5.
Byrne, B. M. and Schneider, B. H. (1988). Perceived Competence Scale for Children: Testing for factorial validity and invariance across age and ability. Applied Measurement in Education, 1, 171-187.
6.
Byrne, B. M. and Shavelson, R. J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 474-481.
7.
Byrne, B. M. and Shavelson, R. J. (1987). Adolescent self-concept: Testing the assumption of equivalent structure across gender. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 365-385.
8.
Byrne, B. M. , Shavelson, R. J., and Muthen, B.Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9.
Cole, D. A. and Maxwell, S. E. (1985). Multitrait-multimethod comparisons across populations: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 389-417.
10.
Gerbing, D. W. and Anderson, J. C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 572-580.
11.
Green, D. R. (1975). What does it mean to say a test is biased?Education and Urban Society, 8, 33-52.
12.
Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409-426.
13.
Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (1985). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Mooresville, Ind.: Scientific Software.
14.
Long, J. S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Marsh, H. W. (in press). The factorial invariance of responses by males and females to a multidimensional self-concept instrument. Multivariate Behavioral Research.
16.
Marsh, H. W. , Barnes, J., and Hocevar, D. (1985). Self-other agreement on multidimensional self-concept ratings: Factor analysis and multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1360-1377.
17.
Marsh, H. W. and Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: Firstand higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
18.
Marsh, H. W. and O'Neill, R. (1984). Self Description Questionnaire: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153-174.
19.
Marsh, H. W. , Richards, G. E., and Barnes, J. (1986). Multidimensional self-concepts: The effect of participation in an outward bound program. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 195-204.
20.
Muthen, B. and Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171-189.
21.
Shavelson, R. J. , Hubner, J. J., and Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Review of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
22.
Tanaka, J. S. and Huba, G. J. (1984). Confirmatory hierarchical factor analyses of psychological distress measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 621-635.
23.
Silon, E. L. and Harter, S. (1985). Assessment of perceived competence, motivational orientation, and anxiety in segregated and mainstreamed educable mentally retarded children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 217-230.
24.
Werts, C. E. , Rock, D. A., Linn, R. L., and Jsreskog, K. G. (1976). Comparison of correlations, variances, covariances, and regression weights with or without measurement error. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1007-1013.
