The dimensionality of the construct of original thinking was examined by using measures designed to control both for the occurrence of confounding of the construct of originality by that of fluency and for task ambiguity. Subjects were 315 gifted children in the fourth, fifth, and sixth grades. The results indicated that original thinking was conceptually distinct from general intelligence. Evidence for a general originality construct was mixed. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
2.
Child, D. (1970). The essentials of factor analysis. New York: Holt.
3.
Christensen, P. R. , Guilford, J. P., Merrifield, P. R., and Wilson, R. C. (1960). Alternate Uses. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.
4.
Christensen, P. R. , Merrifield, P. R., and Guilford, J. P. (1958). Consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.
5.
Clark, P. and Mirels, H. (1970). Fluency as a pervasive element in the measurement of creativity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 83-86.
6.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
7.
Guilford, J. P. (1962). Factors that aid and hinder creativity. Teachers College Record, 63, 380-392.
8.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Harrington, D. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to "be creative" on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454.
10.
Harvey, O. J. , Hoffmeister, J. K., Coates, D., and White, B. J. (1970). A partial evaluation of Torrance's tests of creativity. American Educational Research Journal, 7, 359-372.
11.
Hattie, J. (1980). Should creativity tests be administered under testlike conditions? An empirical study of three alternative conditions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 87-98.
12.
Hocevar, D. (1979a). Consequences-Revised (R) [an unpublished test]. Los Angeles: Author (University of Southern California).
13.
Hocevar, D. (1979b). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191-196.
14.
Hocevar, D. (1979c). Improvements-Revised (R) [an unpublished test]. Los Angeles: Author (University of Southern California).
15.
Hocevar, D. (1979d, April). Multitrait-multimethod analysis of tests of divergent thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association.
16.
Hocevar, D. (1979e). The unidimensional nature of creative thinking in fifth grade children. Child Study Journal, 39, 273-277.
17.
Hocevar, D. (1979f). Unusual Uses-Revised (R) [an unpublished test]. Los Angeles: Author (University of Southern California).
18.
Hocevar, D. and Michael, W. B. (1979). Effects of scoring formula on the discriminant validity of tests of divergent thinking. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 39, 917-921.
19.
Joreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183-202.
20.
Joreskog, K. G. , and Sorbom, D. (1981). LISREL V, Analysis of linear structural relationships by method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources. (Distribution by International Educational Services).
21.
Kazelskis, R. (1972). The convergent, divergent, and factorial validity of the Torrance Figural Test of Creativity. Southern Journal of Educational Research, 6, 123-129.
22.
McKinney, J. and Forman, S. (1977). Factor structure of the Wallach-Kogan tests of creativity and measures of intelligence and achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 14, 41-44.
23.
Milgram, R. (1983). Validation of ideational fluency measures of original thinking in children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 619-624.
24.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Plass, H. , Michael, J. J., and Michael, W. B. (1974). The factorial validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking for a sample of 111 sixth-grade children. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 34, 413-414.
26.
Richards, R. (1979). A comparison of selected Guilford and Wallach-Kogan thinking creative tests in conjunction with measures of intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 3, 151-164.
27.
Speedie, S. , Asher, J., and Treffinger, D. (1971). Comment on "Fluency as a pervasive element in the measurement of creativity."Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 125-126.
28.
Terman, L. M. and Merrill, M. A. (1973). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Manual. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
29.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexington, MA: Ginn and Company.
30.
Wallach, M. A. and Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
31.
Yamamoto, K. and Frengel, B. (1966). An exploratory component analysis of the Minnesota Tests of Creative Thinking. California Journal of Educational Research, 17, 220-229.
