This article is an account of the development of an instrument which measures self-expressed competence in teaching techniques. Psychometric properties of the instrument are discussed including construct validity, stability, and internal consistency. Suggestions for possible use of the instrument in teacher education are included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austad, C. A. (1972). Personality co-related of teacher performance in a microteaching laboratory. Journal of Experimental Education, 40, 1-5.
2.
Child, D. (1973). The essentials of factor analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
3.
Combs, A. E. , Avila, D. L., and Purkey, W. W. (1971). Helping relationships: Basic concepts for the helping professions. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
4.
Dussault, G. (1970). A theory of supervision in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Freeman, J. and Davis, O. L. (1974, April). Relationships of self-concept and teaching behaviors of secondary teacher candidates in microteaching. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
6.
Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207-226.
7.
Gretes, J. A. (1979). Changes in preservice elementary teachers' self-perceptions after a microteaching experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
8.
Hoover, K. H. , et al. (1965). A comparison of expressed teaching strength before and after student teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 16, 324-328.
9.
Jersild, A. T. (1955). When teachers face themselves. New York: Teachers College Press.
