This complete package contains four FORTRAN 77 programs for Markov Model based learning experiments. One program estimates the likelihood of a one-stage learning model, another program delivers these estimates for a two-stage learning model. The third program was designed for hypothesis testing the parameter differences between experimental conditions, whereas the fourth program may be used for hypothesis testing of parameter differences within a particular experimental condition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blalock, H. M. (1982). Conceptualization and measurement in the social sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.
2.
Brainerd, C. J. (1983). Structural invariance in the developmental analysis of learning. In J. Bisanz, G. Bisanz, and R. V. Kail (Eds.), Learning in children: Progress in cognitive development. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3.
Brainerd, C. J. , Howe, M. L., and Kingma, J. (1982). An identifiable model of two-stage learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 26, 263-293.
4.
Brainerd, C. J. , Howe, M. L., Kingma, J., and Brainerd, S. H. (1984). On the measurement of storage and retrieval factors in development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 478-499.
5.
Greeno, J. F. (1982). Identifiability and statistical properties of two-stage learning with no successes in the initial stage. Psychometrika, 33, 173-215.
6.
Greeno, J. G. (1970). How associations are memorized. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Greeno, J. G. (1974). Representation of learning as discrete transition in a finite space. In D. H. Grantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology, Vol. 1. San Francisco: Freeman.
8.
Greeno, J. G. , James, C. T., Da Polito, F., and Polson, P. G. (1978). Associative learning: A cognitive analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Heth, C. D. and Cornell, E. H. (1983). A learning analysis of spatial concept development in infancy. In J. Bisanz, G. Bisanz, and R. V. Kail (Eds.), Learning in the children: Progress in cognitive development research. New York: Springer-Verlag.
10.
Howe, M. L. , Brainerd, C. J., and Kingma, J. (1985). Storage-retrieval processes of normal and learning-disabled children: A stages-of-learning analysis of picture words effects. Child Development, 56, 1120-1133.
11.
Humphreys, M. S. and Greeno, J. G. (1970). Interpretation of the two-stage analysis of paired-associate memorizing. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 275-292.
12.
Kingma, J. (in press). The new two-stage model of learning: A tool for analyzing the loci of memory differences in intellectually impaired children. In J. Bisanz, C. J. Brainerd, and R. V. Kail (Eds.), Formal models of cognitive development. New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
Kingma, J. and Reuvekamp, J. (1987). Markov Count: A program for computing the learning statistics of two-stage Markov learning experiments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 89-97.
14.
Sedlak, A. J. and Walton, M. D. (1982). Sequencing in social repair: A Markov grammar of children's discourse about transgressions. Developmental Review, 2, 305-329.
15.
Wilkinson, A. C. (1982). Theoretical and methodological analysis of partial knowledge. Developmental Review, 2, 274-304.
