This study investigated the effects of past computer experience on the computerized aptitude test performance of college students. Subjects were 92 undergraduates. All subjects completed an arithmetic reasoning test by computer and a Computer Experience Questionnaire. Past computer experience did account for a significant amount of variance on the arithmetic reasoning test. Suggestions regarding the future use of computerized aptitude tests are given.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Burke, M. J. and Normand, J. (1984). On-line computerized testing: The next step for measurement service offices. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Educational Research Association and National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
2.
English, R. A. , Reckase, M. D., and Patience, W. M. (1977). Application of tailored testing to achievement measurement. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 9, 158-161.
3.
Hansen, D. H. and O'Neil, H. F. (1970). Empirical investigations versus anecdotal observations concerning anxiety and computer assisted instruction. Journal of School Psychology, 8, 315-316.
4.
Hedl, J. J. , O'Neil, H. F., and Hansen, E. H. (1973). Affective reactions toward computer-based intelligence testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 217-222.
5.
Hoffman, K. I. and Lundberg, G. D. (1976). A comparison of computer-monitored group tests with paper and pencil tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 791-809.
6.
Johnson, D. F. and Mihal, W. L. (1973). Performance of blacks and whites in computerized versus manual testing environments. American Psychologist, 28, 694-699.
7.
Johnson, D. F. and White, C. B. (1980). Effects of training on computerized test performance in the elderly. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 357-358.
8.
Johnson, J. H. and Johnson, K. N. (1981). Psychological considerations related to the development of computerized testing situations. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 13, 421-424.
9.
Lee, J. A. , Moreno, K. E., and Sympson, J. B. (In press). The effects of mode of test administration on test performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
10.
Moreno, K. E. , Wetzel, C. D., McBride, J. R., and Weiss, D. J. (1984). Relationship between corresponding Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163.
11.
Space, L. G. (1981). The Computer as psychometrician. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 13, 593-606.
12.
Wildgrube, W. (1982, July). Computerized testing in the German Federal Armed Forces (FAF)-Empirical Approaches. Paper presented at the 1982 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference, Spring Hill, MN.
