A description of a Mokken test program to test the robustness of nonparametric stochastic scales is presented. For each sample and the whole population, different scale statistics, both on scale and on item level, are computed recursively. A statistic T is presented for testing the robustness of the scales in the samples.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In S. A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E. A. Suchman, P. F. Lazarsfeld, S. A. Star and J. A. Clausen (Eds.), Measurement and prediction: Studies in social psychology in World War II, (Vol. 4). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. (pp. 60-90).
2.
Henning, H. J. (1976). Die Technik der Mokken Skalenanalysen. Psychologische Beitrage, 18, 410-430.
3.
Kingma, J. (1984). A comparison of four methods of scaling for the acquisition of early number concept. Journal of General Psychology, 110, 23-45.
4.
Kingma, J. and Loth, F. L. (1985). The validation of a developmental scale for seriation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 321-328.
5.
Kingma, J. and Reuvekamp, J. (1984). The construction of a developmental scale for seriation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 1-23.
6.
Kingma, J. and Reuvekamp, J. (1986). Mokken scale: a program for nonparametric stochastic scaling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, This issue.
7.
Kingma, J. and TenVergert, E. M. (1985). A nonparametric scale analysis of the development of conservation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 375-387.
8.
Lippert, E. , Schneider, P. and Wakenhut, R. (1978). Die Verwendung der Skalierungs verfahren von Mokken and Rasch zur Uberprufung und Revision von Einstellungsskalen. Diagnostica, 24, 252-274.
9.
Mokken, R. J. (1969a). Dutch-American comparisons of the "sense of political efficacy."Quality and Quantity, 3, 125-152.
10.
Mokken, R. J. (1969b). Dutch-American comparisons of the "sense of political efficacy": Some remarks on cross-cultural robustness of scales. Acta Politica, 4, 425-468.
11.
Mokken, R. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
12.
Mokken, R. J. and Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 417-430.
13.
STATPAK. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Analytical Inc.
14.
Stokman, F. N. (1977). Roll calls and sponsorship: A methodological analysis of third world group formation in the United Nations. Leyden, The Netherlands: Sythoff.
15.
Stokman, F. N. and Verschuur, W. (1980). Basic scaling. Quality and Quantity, 14, 5-30.
16.
SYSTAT. Evanston, Illinois, 1127 Asbury Avenue: Systat Inc.