Data from 181 Australian first-year university students were analysed to show that learning process subscales, as measured by the Approaches to Studying Inventory (Ramsden and Entwistle, 1981) contributed to the prediction of freshman grades beyond the level possible by tertiary entry achievement scores alone.
Brown, W. F. and Holtzman, W. H. (1955). A study-attitude questionnaire for predicting academic success. Journal of Psychology, 45, 75-84.
3.
Gibbs, G. (1981). Teaching students to learn: A student-centered approach. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
4.
Marton, F. , Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N. (1984). The experience of leaning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
5.
Nie, N. H. , Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G.Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H. (1975). SPSS: Statistical package for the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
7.
Perry, R. (1982). Tertiary Attribution of Achievement Questionnaire. University of Manitoba.
8.
Ramsden, P. and Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368-383.
9.
Watkins, D. (1982). Identifying the study process dimensions of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Education, 26, 76-85.
10.
Watkins, D. (1983a). Assessing tertiary study processes. Human Learning, 2, 29-37.
11.
Watkins, D. (1983b). Tertiary Entrance Scores and first-year grades. Research Report, Australian National University.
