The Effects of Instructors and Student Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Characteristics on the Accuracy of Grades Predicted for an Introductory English Composition Course

Abstract

The effects of different instructors and student Myers-Briggs Type Inventory personality characteristics on the accuracy of predicting 1041 introductory English composition grades from a single regression equation were investigated. The instructor variable was defined by three groups of classes: high grade means, average grade means, and low grade means. The Scholastic Aptitude Test Verbal, Test of Standard Written English, and high school class percentile rank were used as the predictors. Analyses compared the regression equations of the class and student personality subgroups. The results suggested that grades were inflated in classes with high means and deflated in classes with low means. For these classes, there was a difference between the regression equations and there was an interaction of the equations with student personality. In the average class, there was not a difference among the student personality regression equations, although grades were more predictable for certain personality types than others. The findings indicate that the accuracy of predicted grades can be substantially influenced by differences among instructors and student personality types.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams, H.G. and Jernigan, L. P. (1984). Academic support services and the success of high-risk students. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 262-274.

Breland, H. M. and Gaynor, J. L. (1979). A comparison of direct and indirect assessments of writing skill. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16, 119-128.

Brown, J. L. and Lightsey, R. (1970). Differential predictive validity of SAT scores for freshman college English. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 30, 961-965.

Chansky, N. M. (1964). A note on the grade point average in research. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 24, 95-99.

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.

Hogrebe, L. E. , Ervin L. , Dwinell, P. L. , and Newman, I. (1983). The moderating effects of gender and race in predicting the academic performance of college developmental students. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 43, 523-530.

Keirsey, D. and Bates, M. (1978). Please understand me. Del Mar, CA: Promethus Books.

Lanier, D. and Lightsey, R. (1972). Verbal SAT scores and high school averages as predictors. Intellect, 101, 127-128.

Michael W. B. and Shaffer, P. (1978). The comparative validity of the California State University and Colleges English Placement Test (CSCU-EPT) in the prediction of fall semester grade point average and English course grades of first-semester entering freshmen. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 38, 985-1001.

10.

Michael W. B. and Shaffer, P. (1979). A comparison of the validity of the Test of Standard Written English (TSWE) and of the California State University and Colleges English Placement Test (CSUC-EPT) in the prediction of grades in a basic English composition course and of overall freshman-year grade point average. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 39, 131-145.

11.

Myers, I. B. (1980). Gifts differing. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

12.

Passons, W. R. (1967). Predictive validities of the ACT, SAT and high school grades for first semester GPA and freshman courses. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 27, 1143-1144.

13.

Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research (2nd edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.