The authors propose that job satisfaction might be assessed through the measurement of "action tendencies" and report the development of an action tendency job satisfaction instrument. A series of five studies was conducted with workers in a wide range of occupations serving as respondents. The developmental studies indicate that the resulting instrument possesses acceptable reliability, a coherent factor structure, and significant convergent and discriminant validity when contrasted with a traditional measure of job satisfaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berger, C. J. , and Cummings, L. L. (1979). Organizational structure, attitudes, and behaviors. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1, Staw, B. H. (Ed.), Greenwich, Conn., J.A.I. Press.
2.
Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
3.
Chhokar, J. S. and Grigsby, D. W. (1982). An action tendency measure of job satisfaction: a preliminary study. Paper presented at the Southern Management Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
4.
Dunham, R. B. , Smith, F. J., and Blackburn, R. S. (1977). Validation of the index of organizational reactions with the JDI, the MSQ, and Faces scales. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 420-432.
5.
Ferratt, T. W. (1981). Overall job satisfaction: is it a linear function of facet satisfaction?Human Relations, 34, 463-473.
6.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
7.
Graen, G. B. and Ginsburgh, S. (1977). Job resignation as a function of role orientation and leader acceptances: A longitudinal investigation of organization assimilation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 1-17.
8.
Green, P. E. (1978). Analyzing Multivariate Data. Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press.
9.
Hom, T. W. , Katerberg, R., and Hulin, C. L. (1979). Comparative evaluation of three approaches to the prediction of turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology64(3), 280-290.
10.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrica, 30 (2), 179-185.
11.
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In Dunnette, M. E. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
12.
Michaels, E. E. and Spector, P. E. (1979). Causes of employee turnover: Test of Mobley, Griffeth, Hand and Meglino model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(5), 509-517.
13.
Mobley, W. H. , Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., and Meglino, B. M. (1978). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 408-414.
14.
Mowday, R. T. , Koberg, C. S., and McArthur, A. W. (1984). The psychology of the withdrawal process: a cross-validation test of Mobley's intermediate linkages model of turnover in two samples. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 79-94.
15.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
O'Connor, E. J. , Peters, L. H., and Gordon, S. M. (1978). The measurement of job satisfaction: current practices and future considerations. Journal of Management, 4 (2), 17-26.
17.
Parasuramen, S. (1982, August). Predicting turnover intentions and turnover behavior: a multivariate analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 111-121.
18.
Parsons, D. K. , and Hulin, D. L. (1982). Heirarchical factor analysis in applications to the measurement of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 (6), 826-834.
19.
Porter, L. W. and Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 151-176.
20.
Smith, P. C. , Kendall, L. M., and Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago, Rand-McNally.
21.
Staw, B. M. (1984). Organizational behavior: A review and reformulation of the field's outcome variables. In Rosenzweig, M. R. and Porter, L. W. (Eds.) Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 35. Palo Alto, California: Annual Reviews, Inc.
22.
Weiss, D. J. , Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., and Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, Vol. 22. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
23.
Yeager, S. J. (1981). Dimensionality of the Job Descriptive Index. Academy of Management Journal, 24 (1), 205-212.