The Validity of Teacher Ratings in Differentiating Between Two Subgroups of Attention Deficit Disordered Children with or Without Hyperactivity 1

Abstract

A recent analysis of the intercorrelations of teacher ratings of the classroom behavior of 158 attention deficit disordered (ADD) children revealed three factors labeled Emotional Lability/Conduct, Temperament, and Attention/Concentration which in part correspond to the classifications in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM III). To explore further this correspondence, 88 children were identified as those with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADD-H), and 58 children were identified as those with attention deficit disorder without hyperactivity (ADD) in accordance with DSM III criteria. When the two subgroups were compared, teachers rated ADD-H children as more problematic than their ADD counterparts. Results of discriminant analysis further indicated that teacher ratings had the potential to differentiate ADD from ADD-H groups. Findings were interpreted to corroborate the distinction between ADD with and without hyperactivity as delineated in the DSM III. Discussion includes an interpretation of these results to suggest that the attention deficit disorder as exhibited in the classroom is a constellation of related attentional as well as behavioral and temperament disturbances. Recommendations were also made to support the diagnostician's use of teacher ratings in identifying ADD children.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (3rd ed.) Washington, D.C: Author.

Barkley

R. A.

(1981). Specific guidelines for defining hyperactivity in children (Attention Deficit Disorder). in Lahey

Kazdin

(eds.), Advances in child clinical psychology, Vol. 4. New York: Plenum.

Brown

R. T.

Borden

K. A.

Clingerman

S. R.

(1985). Pharmacotherpay in ADD adolescents with special attention to multi-modality treatments. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 21, (2), 192–211.

Conners

C. K.

(1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 885–888.

Douglas

V. I.

(1983). Attentional and cognitive problems. in Rutter

(ed.), Developmental neuropsychiatry, (pp. 280–329). New York: Guilford Press.

Fleiss

(1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.

Keogh

Pullis

(1980). Temperament influences on the development of exceptional children. in Keogh

B. K.

(ed.), Advances in special education. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Mattison

Cantwell

Russell

Will

(1979). A comparison of DSMII and DSM III in the diagnosis of childhood psychiatric disorders: II. Interrater agreement. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 1217–1222.

Nie

N. H.

Hull

C. H.

Jenkins

J. C.

Steinbrenner

Bent

D. H.

(1975). SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Ross

D. M.

Ross

S. A.

(1982). Hyperactivity: Current issues, research, and theory. New York: Wiley.

11.

Rubinstein

R. A.

Brown

R. T.

(1984). An evaluation of the validity of the diagnostic category of attention deficit disorder. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 54, 398–414.

12.

Sleator

E. K.

Ullmann

R. K.

(1981). Can the physician diagnose hyperactivity in the office? Pediatrics, 67, 13–17.

13.

Sleator

E. K.

von Neumann

A. W.

(1974). Methylphenidate in the treatment of hyperactive children. Clinical Pediatrics, 13, 19–30.

14.

Trites

R. L.

Blouin

A. G.

La Prade

(1982). Factor analysis of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale based on a large normative sample. Journal of Counsulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 615–623.

15.

Wechsler

(1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.